Teams

Bonsignore - RS Clay

2025 Escambia Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-02-26vs Punch - RS ClayLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Luis Camero vs Patricia Leahy / Scott Aspinwall6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJim Smith / Emily Hillman vs Thuy Nguyen / David Cederquist3-6, 3-6
2025-02-22vs Haigler - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesJim Smith / Susan Bonsignore vs Tracy Schmidt / Mary Varela6-2, 6-2
2025-02-12vs O'Neill - PCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Luis Camero vs Richard Andresen / Stacy Wilks7-5, 6-3
2025-02-05vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Luis Camero vs Kenneth Wallace / Maria Hicks6-4, 6-1
2025-01-27vs Covington - PCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Hillman / Celine Hansford vs KL LeCOQ / Marie Steen7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEric Stewart / Theresa Smith vs Beau Bullard / Libby Covington6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGordon Paulus / Jennifer Johnson vs Brad Mathis / Kathy Ross3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Russ Parris
published
3.31
Eric Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Celine Hansford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Andrew Hillman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Susan Bonsignore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Luis Camero
published
2.98
Theresa Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Jim Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Malu Dunn
published
Emily Hillman
published
Gordon Paulus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Taunton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Bonsignore + Jim Smith2343% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Russ Parris
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Eric Stewart
18W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Celine Hansford
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Andrew Hillman
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Susan Bonsignore
98W–94L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Luis Camero
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
Theresa Smith
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Jim Smith
83W–69L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Malu Dunn
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Emily Hillman
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gordon Paulus
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Taunton
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.