Teams

SD 4.5WE Pacific Beach TC/ Park

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE Women · SD- Women- WE 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.42 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesTory Hill / Linda Milburn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKellie Doyle / Tory Hill vs Amy Endres / Carolynne Yen0-6, 1-6
2022-06-05vs SD 4.5WE UCRC-Barnes/ CarmichaelLost 01
L#2 DoublesKellie Doyle / Jane Khouw vs Brittany Swenson / Thanh Huyen1-6, 4-6
2022-05-29vs SD 4.5WE Balboa TC/ SeelingerLost 01
L#1 SinglesNeda Mesri vs Beth Sharratt4-6, 2-6
2022-05-15vs SD 4.5WE Balboa TC/ SeelingerWon 10
W#2 DoublesTory Hill / Linda Milburn vs Yoko Anderson / Eleonora MacIocco6-1, 6-2
2022-05-01vs SD 4.5WE UCRC-Barnes/ CarmichaelLost 02
L#1 SinglesNeda Mesri vs Claris Oas1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Culver / Tory Hill vs Margaret Hulme / Sarah Miller4-6, 3-6
2022-04-24Won 10
W#1 SinglesNeda Mesri vs Rachel Serceki6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-16vs SD 4.5WE Balboa TC/ SeelingerWon 10
W#2 DoublesTory Hill / Anne-Maria Leistikow vs Mia Tazi / Jacqueline Chafe2-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
4.24
Linda Milburn
published
4.19
Hillary Park
published 4.5
4.10
Camila Gill
published 4.5
4.09
Janet Podney
published
4.08
Kellie Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Neda Mesri
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.72
Jane Khouw
published
3.41
Tory Hill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Kathleen Culver
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tory Hill + Kellie Doyle23858% games+2.1% vs expected
Hillary Park + Linda Milburn6257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne-Maria Leistikow
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
Linda Milburn
9W–14L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Hillary Park
67W–41L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Camila Gill
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.10
Janet Podney
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Kellie Doyle
129W–116L career · 2 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
4.08
4.5
Neda Mesri
96W–82L career · 3 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.97
Jane Khouw
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Tory Hill
73W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
3.41
Kathleen Culver
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.