Teams

6-MLong-Eno

2023 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-03vs 5-MBLAND-CHTCWon 20
W#2 DoublesDavid Bautz / Gregory Downing vs Jay Bauer / Franck Seguin6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesFJ Magee / Ryan Soles vs Randy Grigg / Ashok Krishnamurthy6-3, 7-6
2023-04-26vs 2-KBuckel-ElmiraSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGregory Downing / Dipendra Shrestha vs Chris Moffitt / Matthew Feldt2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJordan Nader / David Bautz vs Keith Buckel / Marc Rosenthal6-3, 7-6
2023-04-19vs 4-TMiller-CHCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesGregory Downing / Ryan Soles vs Jeff Biersach / Tom Porter3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJordan Nader / David Bautz vs Aaron Meadows / Lucas Beal2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-12vs 1-JMontague-CCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesFJ Magee / Jordan Nader vs Mark Rhoades / Gordon Smith1-6, 1-6
2023-04-05vs 3-MAlimohammadi-EnoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJordan Nader / FJ Magee vs Hsuan Kai Huang / Elias Peters0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Bautz / Dipendra Shrestha vs Aaron Freeman / Reggie Oakley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-29vs 5-MBLAND-CHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Bautz / Jordan Nader vs Gordon Albro / Robert Hulbert2-6, 5-7
2023-03-22vs 1-JMontague-CCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Bautz / Allen Davis vs Robert Long / Mark Rhoades0-6, 1-6
2023-03-08vs 2-KBuckel-ElmiraLost 01
L#1 SinglesDavid Bautz vs Chris Moffitt1-6, 1-6
2023-03-01vs 3-MAlimohammadi-EnoLost 01
L#2 SinglesDavid Bautz vs Elias Peters3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Conor Lynch
published 3
2.88
Gregory Downing
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Russell Davis
published
2.82
Mary T Long
published
2.79
Terrence Hawkins
published
2.77
David Bautz
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 3
2.49
FJ Magee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jordan Nader
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Bautz + Gregory Downing2347% gamesnot enough data
FJ Magee + Terrence Hawkins314 matchesnot enough data
David Bautz + FJ Magee123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Conor Lynch
17W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Gregory Downing
50W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
Russell Davis
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
Terrence Hawkins
16W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
3
David Bautz
28W–43L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Dipendra Shrestha
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
FJ Magee
24W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.49
Jordan Nader
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.