Teams

Aged to Perfection

2023 Shenandoah Adult 55 & Over Women · Shenandoah Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-15vs Over the Net AgainSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJayne Deckwitz / Carisa Dueweke vs Sonia Valdes / Cindy Zettersten4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Wolff / Maureen Bornholdt vs Stephanie Thomas / Kathleen Eickelberg6-3, 3-2
2023-03-08vs Over the Net AgainLost 01
L#1 DoublesKay Bransford / Kim Miller vs Sonia Valdes / Cindy Zettersten4-6, 0-6
2023-03-01vs Over the Net AgainWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Greis / Brenda Bosch vs Jennifer East / Yolanda Alexander6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWendy Hopkins / Susan Spector vs Jeanne Baily / Jill Poretz6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Wolff / Terry Cocozza vs Eileen Smith / Susan Lombardi6-2, 4-3
2023-02-22vs Over the Net AgainWon 10
W#1 DoublesKay Bransford / Kim Miller vs Yolanda Alexander / Cindy Zettersten6-2, 6-5
2023-02-15vs Over the Net AgainWon 21
W#1 DoublesWendy Hopkins / Terry Cocozza vs Jill Poretz / Eileen Smith6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAllison Broadbent / Jayne Deckwitz vs Jennifer East / Sonia Valdes7-5, 3-3
L#3 DoublesCarisa Dueweke / Susan Spector vs Kathleen Eickelberg / Stephanie Thomas0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-02-08vs Over the Net AgainSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Greis / Terry Cocozza vs Yolanda Alexander / Theresa Crowley6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAllison Broadbent / Cheryl Danner vs Jennifer East / Jill Poretz5-7, 2-6
2023-02-01vs Over the Net AgainWon 21
W#1 DoublesKay Bransford / Kim Miller vs Jennifer East / Jeanne Baily6-3, 5-2
W#2 DoublesWendy Hopkins / Terry Cocozza vs Jill Brown / Susan Lombardi6-2, 4-5
L#3 DoublesCarisa Dueweke / Lisa Wolff vs Yolanda Alexander / Theresa Crowley1-6, 2-6
2023-01-25vs Over the Net AgainSplit 11
L#2 DoublesGina Ryan / Carolyn Greis vs Jeanne Baily / Jill Poretz2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Spector / Kim Gabaldon vs Belinda White / Susan Lombardi7-5, 3-4
2023-01-18vs Over the Net AgainSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMaureen Bornholdt / Cheryl Danner vs Jennifer East / Sonia Valdes1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKay Bransford / Kim Miller vs Kecia Brown / Lu Ann Rubenstein6-7, 4-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Kim Miller
published
3.79
Carolyn Greis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Kay Bransford
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Gina Ryan
published
3.55
Susan Spector
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Brenda Bosch
published 4
3.50
Jayne Deckwitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Terry Cocozza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.40
Lisa Wolff
published
3.38
Maureen Bornholdt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Cheryl Danner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Carisa Dueweke
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Margaret Navin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Greis + Terry Cocozza11653% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Greis + Susan Spector7752% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Bornholdt + Cheryl Danner1544% gamesnot enough data
Jayne Deckwitz + Terry Cocozza0534% gamesnot enough data
Jayne Deckwitz + Susan Spector044 matchesnot enough data
Kay Bransford + Carolyn Greis224 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Danner + Terry Cocozza044 matchesnot enough data
Susan Spector + Terry Cocozza224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Miller
42W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.90
4
Carolyn Greis
583W–372L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Kay Bransford
304W–204L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Gina Ryan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Susan Spector
321W–248L career · 3 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Brenda Bosch
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Jayne Deckwitz
74W–98L career · 2 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Terry Cocozza
230W–349L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
Lisa Wolff
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.40
3.5
Maureen Bornholdt
72W–133L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Cheryl Danner
137W–193L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
4
Carisa Dueweke
74W–147L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.32
Margaret Navin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.