Teams

SD 4.0 Mtn View/ Bauer (2/2)

2021 Adult 40 & Over Summer - SD · SD - Men - 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-08Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTim Pillow / Steve Potter vs Steven Gibson / Michael Mead1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-08-01vs SD 4.0 Lake Murray TC/ Hill (2/2)Split 11
L#2 DoublesDaniel Riding / Tim Pillow vs Peter Gray / Scott Rath6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEric Contreras / Steve Potter vs Jeffrey Bertolini / Matthew Flores3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-07-28vs SD 4.0 ECCTA/ Galan (2/2)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSteve Potter / Nicholas Rodrigues vs Jeff Harris / Paul Minifee2-6, 2-6
2021-07-18vs SD 4.0 ECCTA/ Galan (2/2)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSteve Potter / Eric Contreras vs Ping Wu / Raymund Ypon3-6, 2-6
2021-07-11vs SD LLW 4.0 Barnes TC/ TroungLost 02
L#1 DoublesJim Kemp / Steve Potter vs Daniel Pepa / Ieng Srioudom0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEric Bowers / Tim Pillow vs MinhTam Doan / Nghia Hong4-6, 0-6
2021-06-27vs SD 4.0 SDTRC/ Channick (2/2)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEric Contreras / Steve Potter vs Scott Atwood / Steven Gibson2-6, 5-7
2021-06-20vs SD 4.0 Lake Murray TC/ Hill (2/2)Won 10
W#3 DoublesEric Contreras / Steve Potter vs Jack Autry / Nicholas Palmer7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Eric Bowers
published 4
3.94
3.83
Tim Pillow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Henry Matos
published 4
3.27
Steve Potter
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.21
Daniel Riding
published 3.5
Mark Bauer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Bowers + Nicholas Rodrigues314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eric Bowers
14W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Nicholas Rodrigues
44W–46L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Tim Pillow
50W–69L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Henry Matos
9W–21L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
Steve Potter
33W–80L career · 7 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Daniel Riding
3W–12L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
Mark Bauer
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.