Teams

Do.Marks40S

2026 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-26vs Ad.Whitesell40SLost 12
L#1 SinglesJonathan Drum vs David Gorman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJohn Gouveia vs Adam Whitesell6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesDouglas Marks vs Doug Silverman0-6, 3-6
2026-07-22vs Ch.Nystrom40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesJonathan Drum vs Josh Hastings6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesTodd Blevins vs David Harris1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesRick Lowe vs Eric Forti6-4, 6-3
2026-07-19vs Jo.Hulicki40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesJonathan Drum vs Spence Huffstetler6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesDouglas Marks vs John Hulicki3-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesRick Lowe vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-28vs Li.Larson40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesJonathan Drum vs Casey Smith6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesDouglas Marks vs Demar Neal5-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesRick Lowe vs Gregory McKenna1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-21vs Ad.Whitesell40SLost 03
L#1 SinglesJonathan Drum vs David Dare3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDouglas Marks vs David Gorman2-6, 1-4
L#3 SinglesTodd Blevins vs Marcus Tuttle2-6, 0-6
2026-06-14vs Jo.Hulicki40SLost 03
L#1 SinglesDouglas Marks vs John Hulicki6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesScott Hoffman vs Mark Wood4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesTodd Blevins vs David Clark4-6, 2-6
2026-05-17vs Li.Larson40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesJonathan Drum vs Demar Neal7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesDouglas Marks vs Duane Hall4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesScott Hoffman vs Matthew Pare4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ad.Whitesell40S7120411130
2Do.Marks40S4391226192
3Jo.Hulicki40S35101429237
4Li.Larson40S3591533241
5Ch.Nystrom40S2581327193

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Scott Hoffman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.42
Jonathan Drum
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
John Gouveia
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.27
Todd Blevins
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.27
Douglas Marks
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.13
Rick Lowe
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Hoffman
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
3.44
3.5
Jonathan Drum
102W–110L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
John Gouveia
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
Todd Blevins
12W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
Douglas Marks
4W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Rick Lowe
50W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.