Teams

Edwardson/Huck

2021 Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 7.0 Mx

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-04-18vs Ledray/Sutphen- Racq PacSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTia Fjelstad / Alejandro Trevino vs Beth Arps / Don Galvin6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDaniel Edwardson / Marisa Simonetti vs Susan Ledray / Patrick Ledray6-2, 2-4
2021-04-11vs WolsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarisa Simonetti / Daniel Edwardson vs Michelle Finley / Aaron Peck3-6, 1-6
2021-03-28vs NussbaumLost 01
L#1 DoublesJessica Alexander / Alejandro Trevino vs Michelle Buron / JJ Parker5-7, 3-6
2021-03-21vs Boese - B&W Ruff WinterLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Huck / Daniel Edwardson vs Sarah Tuel / Ammarith Komany7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-03-07vs Ledray/Sutphen- Racq PacWon 10
W#2 DoublesJessica Alexander / Daniel Edwardson vs Kathleen Hultman / James McCann6-1, 6-4
2021-02-21vs NussbaumWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Huck / Alejandro Trevino vs Sally Gilchrist / Geoff Schmid3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mx have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Jeffrey Connell
published
4.17
Phillip Chase
published 4.5
3.80
Koushik Dutta
published
3.66
Laura Huck
published
3.56
Suzy Griffith
published
3.39
Daniel Edwardson
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.18
Alejandro Trevino
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.28
Kelly Stordahl
published
Lauren Smith-Kiewel
published
Nik Larsen
published
Stephen Huck
published
Tia Fjelstad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Koushik Dutta + Laura Huck10160% games+12.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Connell
12W–16L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Phillip Chase
112W–51L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
Koushik Dutta
45W–28L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
Laura Huck
16W–15L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
Suzy Griffith
17W–20L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Daniel Edwardson
99W–70L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Alejandro Trevino
221W–280L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
Kelly Stordahl
10W–39L career · no lines in 2021
96%4%<1%
2.28
Lauren Smith-Kiewel
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nik Larsen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephen Huck
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tia Fjelstad
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.