Teams

TOC.Desai

2026 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-27vs ANP.PasangulapatiWon 21
W#1 SinglesVidit Desai vs Krishna Alijala6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Sudheer Parvithina1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesElton TSAI vs Joo Lee5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-19vs TOC.PerianLost 02
L#1 SinglesElton TSAI vs Junhua Wu3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Jack Hu2-6, 2-6
2026-07-28vs ANP.PasangulapatiLost 12
W#1 SinglesAnjaneya Tiwari vs Sudheer Parvithina6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesScott Scarneo vs Joo Lee1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Krishna Alijala1-6, 6-7
2026-07-14vs ANP.PasangulapatiWon 21
L#1 SinglesElton TSAI vs AJAY VARMA GANAPATHIRAJU4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Krishna Alijala7-6, 7-6
W#3 SinglesAnjaneya Tiwari vs Balaji Radhakrishnan6-0, 6-1
2026-06-30vs TOC.PerianLost 02
L#1 SinglesScott Scarneo vs Ghanshyamsinh Gohil2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesVidit Desai vs Rahul Narang2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-23vs TOC.PerianLost 02
L#2 SinglesElton TSAI vs Jack Hu1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesVidit Desai vs Rahul Santha2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-06-03vs TOC.RarangolWon 10
W#3 SinglesAbhimanyu Joshi vs Nathan Rarangol6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Desai2481020152
2TOC.Rarangol0621632201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Devin Bhatt
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Abhimanyu Joshi
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.99
Anjaneya Tiwari
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.81
Elton TSAI
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.80
Scott Scarneo
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.71
Vidit Desai
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.43
Amit Sachan
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abhimanyu Joshi + Anjaneya Tiwari121053% games+2.8% vs expected
Amit Sachan + Abhimanyu Joshi134 matchesnot enough data
Amit Sachan + Anjaneya Tiwari213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Devin Bhatt
11W–3L career · type D · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.25
4
Abhimanyu Joshi
123W–66L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Anjaneya Tiwari
95W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.99
Elton TSAI
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Scott Scarneo
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Vidit Desai
60W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Amit Sachan
255W–240L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.