Teams

OC Baseline Bullies - LPC - Lee - Sun3

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Men - 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
L#1 DoublesJerikko Timm Agatep / An Pham vs Phillip Chen / Edmund Hsu1-6, 3-6
2025-12-14vs OC Dana Hills - AlanLost 01
L#1 DoublesDion Fong / Hoang Kim Truong vs Christopher Perry / Christopher Gates3-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesKevin Tu / Ethan Dubil vs Brandon Hovard / Joshua Snyder3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDion Fong / Christopher Contreras vs Bryson Eastwood / David Dunn6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDaniel Tat / Alexander Chang vs Paul Gill / Tom Duddy6-4, 7-5
2025-11-30vs WC OC LNRC - AviLost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Tat / Kevin Tu vs Dawson Janeski / Denton Chase6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEthan Dubil / Darren Ly vs Josh Johnson / Noh Jin Park3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLee Nguyen / Christopher Contreras vs Dustin Hladek / David Stark1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesZachary Anderson / Junha Baek vs Chris Brown / Ian Williams6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlexander Chang / Daniel Tat vs John Randall Croy / Grant Hogan6-2, 6-2
2025-11-09vs OC LPC - Rudy - S/S9Won 30
W#1 DoublesEthan Dubil / Zachary Anderson vs Long Nguyen / Lawrence Leung6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDaniel Tat / Alexander Chang vs Rudy Henderson / Jeremy Schwartz6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKevin Tu / Brian Hoang vs Steve Ho / Huy Le6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAn Pham / Jerikko Timm Agatep vs Michael Zhang / York Cheng3-6, 5-7
2025-10-25vs OC Dana Hills - AlanWon 21
W#1 DoublesKevin Tu / Darren Ly vs Graham Guerette / Luca Roth6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLee Nguyen / Brian Hoang vs Christopher Perry / Duane Hiveley1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesChristopher Contreras / An Pham vs Mitchell Austin / Alan Roof6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesZachary Anderson / Kevin Tu vs Paul Gill / Craig Thomas2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLee Nguyen / Brian Hoang vs Tom Duddy / Bryson Eastwood1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJunha Baek / Hoang Kim Truong vs Jeffrey Johnston / Jason Bobb6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-12vs WC OC LNRC - AviLost 12
W#1 DoublesAn Pham / Junha Baek vs John Norton / Carlo Poledrelli3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEthan Dubil / Kevin Tu vs Josh Johnson / Noh Jin Park2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristopher Contreras / Hoang Kim Truong vs Geoffrey Bishop / Justin Edwards1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesKevin Tu / Zachary Anderson vs Brian Knebel / Chris Brown7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesChristopher Contreras / Wataru Takahashi vs John Randall Croy / Geoff Kowalski2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEthan Dubil / Darren Ly vs Grant Hogan / Tommy Ha7-5, 6-3
2025-09-21vs OC LPC - Rudy - S/S9Won 10
W#3 DoublesAn Pham / Jerikko Timm Agatep vs Rudy Henderson / Huy Le6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Men - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
An Pham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.28
Daniel Tat
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Christopher Contreras
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Darren Ly
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Dion Fong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.01
Brian Hoang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.93
Ethan Dubil
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.93
Kevin Tu
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.91
Jerikko Timm Agatep
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.89
Hoang Kim Truong
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Junha Baek
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Wataru Takahashi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ethan Dubil + Darren Ly134 matchesnot enough data
Junha Baek + An Pham213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
An Pham
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Daniel Tat
11W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Christopher Contreras
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Darren Ly
16W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Dion Fong
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
4.15
4
Brian Hoang
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.01
Ethan Dubil
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.93
Kevin Tu
13W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.93
4.5
Jerikko Timm Agatep
30W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.91
Hoang Kim Truong
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Junha Baek
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wataru Takahashi
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.