Teams

Hunters Green Machine - E. Hajek

2021 Hillsborough Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.56 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesSean Friday / Ann Coston vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-13vs HCC Rip and Sip - H. DinhWon 20
W#2 DoublesSean Friday / Ann Coston vs Chi Ming Yu / Nelci Rodrigues3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTibbie Farnsworth / Matthew Warren vs Huy Dinh / Kelly Armagost7-6, 6-1
2021-06-06vs Hills - Arbor Greene/B. HartLost 02
L#2 DoublesSean Friday / Ann Coston vs Enrique Escobar / Jody McNamee1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesErik Hajek / Tina Sturdevant vs Geri Burke / JIM KNETSCH3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTibbie Farnsworth / Matthew Warren vs Marija Seovic / Kalicharan Durgampudi6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2021-04-25Lost 02
L#1 DoublesErik Hajek / Tina Sturdevant vs Jiangchuan Hu / Caroline Brenan4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Warren / Ann Coston vs Amber Morgenstern / Jay Jadeja2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-18vs HCC Spoilers - M. PalmerLost 01
L#2 DoublesTibbie Farnsworth / Stephen Hunter vs Jeffrey Biezunski / Yenny Velez3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
3.79
Erik Hajek
published 4
3.68
Eddie Collins
published 4
3.48
Fan Wang
published 3.5
3.34
Tibbie Farnsworth
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Sean Friday
published
3.25
Ann Coston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Ian Zhang
published 3.5
3.07
Xue Chan
published
2.82
Gregg Sturdevant
published 3
2.65
Tina Sturdevant
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
John Slatniske
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ian Zhang + Fan Wang404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne-Lucie Bouchard
30W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Erik Hajek
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Eddie Collins
8W–13L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Fan Wang
32W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Tibbie Farnsworth
209W–139L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
Sean Friday
13W–13L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Ann Coston
119W–101L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ian Zhang
17W–7L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Xue Chan
7W–12L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
3
Gregg Sturdevant
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Tina Sturdevant
184W–133L career · 2 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
John Slatniske
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.