Teams

MKKearney (Carmel)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 5.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-26vs RBostic/CLogar (Weddington)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJasmine Karasek / Keri Beach vs Erin Obrien / Tracey Hunt6-4, 6-1
2023-09-19vs VShannon (Raintree)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Clements / Keri Beach vs Caroline Cox / Vicky Shannon1-6, 1-6
2023-09-10vs ABroemel/KBeck (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKeri Beach / Courtney Jackson vs Allison Broemel / Ree Snyder3-6, 2-6
2023-08-22vs SBurke (Raintree)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Rafferty / Keri Beach vs Andrea Caldini / Crissa Klein2-6, 3-6
2023-08-21vs RAddison (Park Road)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKeri Beach / Tiffany Ashmore vs Mary Claire Brown / Courtney Stallmann1-6, 1-6
2023-08-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStefania Faraj / Keri Beach vs Dana Zimmer / Jen Meyer0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Stefania Faraj
published
2.85
Keri Beach
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Julie Clements
published
2.74
Crystal Allen
published 3
2.62
Lisa Beebe
published
2.57
Melinda van Hecke
published
2.35
Tiffany Ashmore
published
2.33
Emily Hodge
published
2.32
Courtney Jackson
published 2.5
2.13
Anne McCurry
published 2.5
2.13
Julia Rafferty
published
2.04
Mary Kate Kearney
published
Jasmine Karasek
published
Kelli Chesson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Jackson + Mary Kate Kearney213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stefania Faraj
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Keri Beach
45W–33L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Julie Clements
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Crystal Allen
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
Lisa Beebe
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%20%80%
2.62
Melinda van Hecke
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%31%69%
2.57
Tiffany Ashmore
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%86%14%
2.35
Emily Hodge
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Courtney Jackson
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Anne McCurry
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Julia Rafferty
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Mary Kate Kearney
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Jasmine Karasek
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelli Chesson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.