Teams

PETALUMA TA/CASA GRANDE HS 40AW4.0A

2021 ADULT 40 & Over · Women's 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Joanna Frazier
published
3.94
Grace Zhang
published 4
3.85
Anusuya Mokashi
published 4
Geeta Menon
published 4
3.74
3.54
Mary Gamble
published
3.49
Jeri Obert
published
3.48
Kathy Halligan
published
3.45
Jean Elliott
published
3.42
Erin Henke
published 3.5
3.41
Leslie Grevin
published
3.21
Chris Grace
published 3.5
3.13
Michele Andersen
published
Quynh Pearson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanna Frazier + Annie van Den Toorn4161% games+6.7% vs expected
Mary Gamble + Joanna Frazier224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Gamble + Kathy Halligan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joanna Frazier
15W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
Grace Zhang
8W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Anusuya Mokashi
9W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Geeta Menon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Annie van Den Toorn
25W–11L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.74
Mary Gamble
22W–24L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.54
Jeri Obert
22W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kathy Halligan
8W–14L career · no lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
3.48
Jean Elliott
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Erin Henke
14W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
Leslie Grevin
6W–19L career · no lines in 2021
76%24%<1%
3.41
3.5
Chris Grace
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Michele Andersen
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
Quynh Pearson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.