Teams

MHolt-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 10 7:00 PM
Hardscrabble
Sep 19 4:00 PM
Duke University Faculty Club
Sep 24 6:30 PM
Duke University Faculty Club
Oct 1 8:00 PM
Chapel Hill Tennis Club Inc
2026-08-29vs GGlish-CHTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesRalph Russo / Mike Kempel vs Bob Stocking / Mark Bland6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDave Thomas / Scott Hartman vs Dan Tudor / CHARLES ENDERLINE4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Holt / Jeff Denhard vs Randy Cubrilovic / Bill Stewart0-6, 3-6
2026-08-20vs EFuguet.55C-DFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Holt / David Evert vs John StClair / Rick Edmunds6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesScott Hartman / Jeff Denhard vs Matthew Feldt / Adam Rust6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Stefan / David Nagelhout vs Donald Berger / Carl Laird2-6, 1-6
2026-08-13vs GGlish-CHTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesValdis Stiebris / Mike Kempel vs Mark Bland / Adam Strom3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJAMES MONTAGUE / Dave Thomas vs Bill Stewart / Bob Stocking6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRalph Russo / Andy Jones vs Franck Seguin / Doug Kopec3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EFuguet.55C-DFC1021225
2MHolt-DUR1021325

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Michael Holt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
JAMES MONTAGUE
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Mike Kempel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Ralph Russo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Mark Macdonald
published
3.13
David Stefan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Scott Hartman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Valdis Stiebris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Dave Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
David Evert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Jeff Denhard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Mike Liller
published
2.69
Andy Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
David Nagelhout
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Van Blalock
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Thomas + Andy Jones1443% gamesnot enough data
David Evert + David Nagelhout2343% gamesnot enough data
Valdis Stiebris + David Nagelhout314 matchesnot enough data
Ralph Russo + Mike Kempel314 matchesnot enough data
David Nagelhout + Jeff Denhard224 matchesnot enough data
Dave Thomas + Mike Liller303 matchesnot enough data
Valdis Stiebris + David Evert123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Holt
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
JAMES MONTAGUE
17W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
Mike Kempel
27W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.33
Ralph Russo
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Mark Macdonald
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
David Stefan
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Scott Hartman
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Valdis Stiebris
57W–72L career · 1 line in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.08
3
Dave Thomas
17W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
David Evert
35W–53L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Jeff Denhard
49W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Mike Liller
10W–6L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Andy Jones
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
David Nagelhout
44W–55L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
2.5
Van Blalock
20W–22L career · no lines in 2026
0%15%85%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.