Teams

Yadkin/Howard/40 3.0

2025 Yadkin Valley Singles 40 & Over · Women 3.0 - Monday Night

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-28vs Yadkin/Georgitis/40 3.0 SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesAlyssa Howards vs Samantha Talbott0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesKaren Lehman vs Tammy LaValley4-6, 3-6
2025-07-21vs Yadkin/Georgitis/40 3.0 SinglesSplit 11
W#2 SinglesJenny Orr vs Tammy LaValley6-4, 7-5
L#3 SinglesKaren Lehman vs Inge Smith4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-14vs Yadkin/Georgitis/40 3.0 SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesJenny Orr vs Samantha Talbott6-1, 7-6
L#2 SinglesKaren Lehman vs Dana Alligood1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesAlyssa Howards vs Cathy Ralston6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-07-07vs Yadkin/Georgitis/40 3.0 SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesAlyssa Howards vs Dana Alligood3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKaren Lehman vs Cathy Ralston6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSarah Blackwell vs Kimberle Collet4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-06-30vs Yadkin/Georgitis/40 3.0 SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesKaren Lehman vs Kimberle Collet2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Blackwell vs Samantha Talbott5-7, 2-6
2025-06-23vs Yadkin/Georgitis/40 3.0 SinglesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJenny Orr vs Cathy Ralston6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKaren Lehman vs Deana Georgitis1-6, 4-6
2025-06-16vs Yadkin/Georgitis/40 3.0 SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesSarah Blackwell vs Tammy LaValley6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesAlyssa Howards vs Kimberle Collet4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-09vs Yadkin/Georgitis/40 3.0 SinglesLost 12
W#1 SinglesAlyssa Howards vs Samantha Talbott7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKaren Lehman vs Cathy Ralston3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesSarah Blackwell vs Deana Georgitis2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 - Monday Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Jenny Orr
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.92
Alyssa Howards
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #3 Singles 38% · published 3
2.87
Sarah Blackwell
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Amy Mills
published 3
2.47
Karen Lehman
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyssa Howards + Sarah Blackwell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenny Orr
40W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Alyssa Howards
35W–35L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Sarah Blackwell
24W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Amy Mills
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Lehman
17W–48L career · 7 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.