Teams

O'Neill - PCC

2025 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-06vs Struck - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesEnoch Rycroft / Alexia Rycroft vs Timothy Sumrall / Emma Sumrall6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-30vs Abel - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesApril Schweigert / Rick Cuny vs Rene Abel / James Craft0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-23vs Escambia/Andresen/18&Over7.0XLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlexia Rycroft / Enoch Rycroft vs Alexander Weil / Adele Dorion5-7, 4-6
2025-07-17vs Punch - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesApril Schweigert / Rick Cuny vs Mary Bryan / Troy Gill6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAlexia Rycroft / Enoch Rycroft vs Glenn Langan / Gloria Langan6-2, 7-6
2025-07-02vs Davies - PCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesCreagh Ekelund / Michael Yager vs Rhett Gross / Amanda Davies6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCharlie Culpepper / Valerie Wilson vs Mallie Woodfin / Scott Goossens6-3, 6-1
2025-06-25vs Fabbro - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesApril Schweigert / Rick Cuny vs Tucker Massey / Megan Zimmerman6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Alexia Rycroft
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.83
Rick Cuny
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Michael Yager
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Natalie Mcelhany
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Matthew O'Neill
published
3.32
Valerie Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
April Schweigert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Creagh Ekelund
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Gordon Wilson
published 3.5
3.10
Sandra Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Charlie Culpepper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Mcelhany + Matthew O'Neill10166% games+17.3% vs expected
Gordon Wilson + Sandra Wilson6159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexia Rycroft
28W–18L career · 12 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
Rick Cuny
100W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Michael Yager
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Natalie Mcelhany
29W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.62
Matthew O'Neill
40W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Valerie Wilson
8W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
April Schweigert
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Creagh Ekelund
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Gordon Wilson
7W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Wilson
16W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Charlie Culpepper
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.