Teams

Cheval Aces and Sevens - L. Hanna

2022 Hillsborough Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-15vs Tampa Palms 7.0 Mixed - R .HelmeLost 01
L#2 DoublesMatthew Hayes / Lorrie White vs Richard Helme / Xue Chan1-6, 4-6
2022-06-26vs Hills/B. HartLost 01
L#1 DoublesLouis Hanna / Lorrie White vs Sylvain Gauthier / Lourdes Bacardi2-6, 2-6
2022-06-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesLorrie White / Louis Hanna vs Mai Nguyen / Toi Phan6-1, 6-1
2022-05-22vs FH Fireworks - J. MedinaLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarija Seovic / Aleksandar Seovic vs Stephane Duroseau / Patrick Duroseau4-6, 3-6
2022-05-15vs Tampa Palms 7.0 Mixed - R .HelmeLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Hayes / Lorrie White vs Robert Miller / QuynhTran Tonnu5-7, 1-6
2022-05-01vs Grand Hampton - A. NunezLost 01
L#1 DoublesAleksandar Seovic / Marija Seovic vs Caroline Brenan / Andres Buitrago0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
3.64
Matthew Hayes
published
3.38
Terry Wilson
published
3.35
3.32
Fatima Zinober
published 3.5
3.31
Marija Seovic
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Edward Lindblom
published 3.5
3.20
Ken Patrick
published
3.15
Lorrie White
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Lisa Crow
published
3.07
Aleksandar Seovic
published 3.5
2.98
Melissa Chevalier
published
2.57
Lauren Constantine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Constantine + Charles Constantine4348% games+7.8% vs expected
Lisa Crow + Kalicharan Durgampudi314 matchesnot enough data
Lorrie White + Ken Patrick033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charles Constantine
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Matthew Hayes
17W–23L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Terry Wilson
10W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Kalicharan Durgampudi
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Fatima Zinober
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Marija Seovic
99W–72L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Edward Lindblom
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Ken Patrick
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Lorrie White
184W–124L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Lisa Crow
14W–17L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Aleksandar Seovic
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
Melissa Chevalier
13W–11L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
Lauren Constantine
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.