Teams

Archedon

2023 One Doubles · 3.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Steve Russell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Mister Archedon
published 3.5
3.05
Lee Wiegand
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
David Shook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results6 ties
2023-08-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMister Archedon / Lee Wiegand vs Joe Malboeuf / Zach Walsh6-3, 4-6
2023-07-31Won 10
W#1 DoublesMister Archedon / Lee Wiegand vs Greg Marx / Chris Simpson6-1, 7-5
2023-07-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMister Archedon / Steve Russell vs Matt Deems / Zachary Meloche6-0, 6-1
2023-07-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMister Archedon / Steve Russell vs Huy Bui / Austin Rice-Stitt6-3, 6-3
2023-07-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMister Archedon / Lee Wiegand vs Greg Marx / Chris Simpson6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-07-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Shook / Lee Wiegand vs Robert Broad / Jim DeWeese6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Steve Russell
45W–46L career
1%99%0%
3.25
3.5
Mister Archedon
108W–47L career
7%93%0%
3.12
3
Lee Wiegand
62W–61L career · type A
0%70%30%
3.05
3
David Shook
34W–36L career
0%91%9%
2.92

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.