Teams

WOB:Woburn Blue:Chaudhuri

2022 EMA Tri Level Fall 2022 · 3.5M

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-11-17vs WOB:Woburn Red:YangWon 10
W#1 DoublesMurali Kothandaraman / Satish Gopalakrishnan vs Matheus Barros / Zhiyong Yang6-4, 6-3
2022-11-13vs WOB:Woburn Green:KumarWon 10
W#1 DoublesGK Raju / Satish Gopalakrishnan vs Gopi Unni Krishnan / Dipun Biswal6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2022-11-06vs WOB:Woburn White:ErandeWon 10
W#1 DoublesBala Balachander / GK Raju vs Tyler Baughcome / Gautam Erande7-6, 7-5
2022-10-30vs WOB:Woburn Red:YangLost 01
L#1 DoublesBala Balachander / Ayan Chaudhuri vs Zhiyong Yang / Matheus Barros3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-10-23vs WOB:Woburn Green:KumarWon 10
W#1 DoublesBala Balachander / GK Raju vs Dipun Biswal / Aravind Udayakumar6-1, 6-3
2022-10-16vs WOB:Woburn White:ErandeWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshish Aggarwal / Satish Gopalakrishnan vs Tyler Baughcome / Gautam Erande6-1, 6-0
2022-10-09vs WOB:Woburn Red:YangLost 01
L#1 DoublesBala Balachander / Murali Kothandaraman vs Zhiyong Yang / Matheus Barros1-6, 2-6
2022-10-02vs WOB:Woburn Green:KumarWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshish Aggarwal / Ayan Chaudhuri vs Gopi Unni Krishnan / Aravind Udayakumar6-2, 6-3
2022-09-25vs WOB:Woburn White:ErandeWon 10
W#1 DoublesAyan Chaudhuri / Satish Gopalakrishnan vs Gautam Erande / Tyler Baughcome6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WOB:Woburn Red:Yang8181356
2WOB:Woburn Blue:Chaudhuri7272561
3PAX:Paxton Double N:Petmezis4242543
4PAX:Andrew's All Stars:Andrianopoulos4242761
5WOB:Woburn Green:Kumar272716103
6NETC:New England TC:Ghosh15151065
7WOB:Woburn White:Erande181816108

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ashish Aggarwal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ayan Chaudhuri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bala Balachander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
GK Raju
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Murali Kothandaraman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Satish Gopalakrishnan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

GK Raju + Bala Balachander5163% games+12.9% vs expected
GK Raju + Satish Gopalakrishnan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashish Aggarwal
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Ayan Chaudhuri
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Bala Balachander
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
GK Raju
11W–1L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Murali Kothandaraman
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Satish Gopalakrishnan
11W–1L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.