Teams

Alisal-Hot Shots

SoCal Doubles League - SB Fall 2021 · SB - Women Doubles - 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-11-21vs SBTC-Volley GirlsLost 01
L#2 DoublesTerrie Bugay / Naomi Eskenazi vs Kersten Barr / Daisy Carlson2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-11-14vs SB-LLW-Unstrung-Beth FordWon 10
W#2 DoublesNaomi Eskenazi / Sally Jordan vs Dyanne Wipf / Abigail Galyon6-3, 7-6
2021-11-07vs Elings-Spanks a LotWon 10
W#2 DoublesSally Jordan / Naomi Eskenazi vs Cynthia Frohling / Jeanelle Posch7-5, 6-4
2021-10-31vs SBTC-Volley GirlsWon 10
W#3 DoublesNaomi Eskenazi / Sally Jordan vs Jill Crang / Julie Rosenthal6-4, 7-6
2021-10-24vs SB-LLW-Unstrung-Beth FordWon 10
W#3 DoublesNaomi Eskenazi / Sara Oshaughnessy vs Nina Quattrocchi / Cindy Steffen6-4, 6-2
2021-10-17vs Elings-Spanks a LotWon 10
W#3 DoublesNaomi Eskenazi / Sara Oshaughnessy vs Catherine Gautier / Jeanelle Posch6-0, 6-0
2021-09-19vs SB-LLW-Unstrung-Beth FordLost 01
L#3 DoublesNaomi Eskenazi / Stella Hahn vs Beverly Aronson / Yang Ja Ballard1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Women Doubles - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Gigi Hollister
published 4
3.69
Naomi Eskenazi
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.66
Sara Oshaughnessy
published
3.62
Caron Berryhill
published 4
3.49
Rosemary Talmadge
published
3.19
Sally Jordan
published
Roxanne Clare
published
Stella Hahn
published
Terrie Bugay
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gigi Hollister + Sara Oshaughnessy5257% games−1.7% vs expected
Rosemary Talmadge + Gigi Hollister3843% games−7.0% vs expected
Stella Hahn + Roxanne Clare4159% gamesnot enough data
Sally Jordan + Roxanne Clare224 matchesnot enough data
Sally Jordan + Terrie Bugay314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gigi Hollister
30W–26L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Naomi Eskenazi
40W–41L career · 7 lines in 2021
8%92%1%
3.69
Sara Oshaughnessy
12W–6L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Caron Berryhill
14W–13L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.62
Rosemary Talmadge
33W–44L career · no lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.49
Sally Jordan
38W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%8%92%
3.19
Jenne Lee Bonaccorsi
14W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Roxanne Clare
20W–23L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Stella Hahn
10W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Terrie Bugay
17W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.