Teams

WRC:3.5 Tri:Lieberson/Even

2025 SCT Tri-Level Women's 3.0-5.0 · 3.5 Women's Tri-Level 1

6 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-18vs GCC: 3.5 Tri:RothLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlissa Wilson / Karen Greenblatt vs Kate Fix / Ashley Smith6-7, 4-6
2025-11-02vs TCT: W Tri: FranchiniWon 10
W#1 DoublesTrudie Gubitz / Brooke Craemer vs ARLYNE THUNG / Supreeti Saikia7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAlissa Wilson / Karen Greenblatt vs Kim Bandak / Laurie Walls7-5, 4-3
2025-09-27vs 4S:Unforced Terror: BuonoLost 01
L#1 DoublesDara Lieberson / Karen Greenblatt vs Silvana Buono / Kelly Chapple3-6, 4-6
2025-09-27vs 4S:Trifecta:Lodato/AmadeoLost 01
L#1 DoublesTrudie Gubitz / Brooke Craemer vs Jennifer Amadeo / Flavia Lodato7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-12vs 4S:Nuts:Ortiz/CazenaveWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Even / Alissa Wilson vs Carola Cazenave / Hillary Salo6-2, 6-3
2025-09-08vs 4S:One For All:RoseLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichele Even / Trudie Gubitz vs Janel Downs / Lynn Enquist1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Women's Tri-Level 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GCC: 3.5 Tri:Roth0770140
2MRC 3.5 Southern CT Tri Level:Bandak0752545
34S:Trifecta:Lodato/Amadeo0752558
44S:One For All:Rose0734862
5WRC:3.5 Tri:Lieberson/Even0734975
64S:Unforced Terror: Buono07251074
74S:Nuts:Ortiz/Cazenave07251172
8TCT: W Tri: Franchini07161275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Brooke Craemer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Alissa Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Karen Greenblatt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Trudie Gubitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Michele Even
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Dara Lieberson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Even + Dara Lieberson6455% games+11.8% vs expected
Karen Greenblatt + Alissa Wilson10358% games+10.0% vs expected
Dara Lieberson + Trudie Gubitz9358% games+8.5% vs expected
Michele Even + Karen Greenblatt3252% games+3.9% vs expected
Dara Lieberson + Karen Greenblatt2939% games−13.5% vs expected
Karen Greenblatt + Trudie Gubitz5161% gamesnot enough data
Michele Even + Trudie Gubitz1435% gamesnot enough data
Trudie Gubitz + Brooke Craemer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brooke Craemer
56W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Alissa Wilson
131W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
Karen Greenblatt
64W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Trudie Gubitz
41W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Michele Even
51W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Dara Lieberson
103W–124L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.