Teams

Single Racqs

2025 Prince Georges Singles · Prince Georges Singles 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-05vs Double the FunWon 10
W#1 SinglesClaris Brock vs Karen Francis6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-30vs SpinergyWon 20
W#2 SinglesNicole Ifill vs Fri-Atsoh AchiriMofor6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesClaris Brock vs Katie Little6-1, 6-0
2025-11-16vs Double the FunWon 10
W#2 SinglesNicole Ifill vs Hannah Yoo6-1, 6-3
2025-11-09vs SpinergyWon 20
W#2 SinglesNicole Ifill vs Kayla Lesesne7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMia Piansay vs Lorena Alfaro6-4, 6-3
2025-11-01vs Love All AroundWon 20
W#2 SinglesNicole Ifill vs Anna-Karina Caudevilla7-6, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRuxandra Badiu vs Sailata Katragadda6-1, 6-2
2025-10-18vs SpinergySplit 11
L#1 SinglesRuxandra Badiu vs Qiuxian Li7-5, 3-5
W#3 SinglesNicole Ifill vs Fri-Atsoh AchiriMofor6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-12vs Love All AroundLost 01
L#3 SinglesMia Piansay vs Anna-Karina Caudevilla3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-05vs Double the FunLost 02
L#1 SinglesClaris Brock vs Sarah Shomstein6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMia Piansay vs Yulan Jin2-6, 1-6
2025-09-21vs Love All AroundSplit 11
L#1 SinglesClaris Brock vs Sharon Cohen5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesRuxandra Badiu vs Carol Darling7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Nicole Ifill
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.46
Claris Brock
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Ruxandra Badiu
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Diem Salmon
published 3.5
3.31
TingTing Du
published
Brandy Malbrough
published 3.5
3.23
Amber Surmiller
published 3.5
3.21
Mia Piansay
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mia Piansay + Claris Brock101053% games+6.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nicole Ifill
253W–215L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Claris Brock
420W–275L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Ruxandra Badiu
478W–217L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Diem Salmon
63W–49L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
TingTing Du
13W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Brandy Malbrough
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Amber Surmiller
22W–37L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Mia Piansay
244W–303L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.