Teams

OC LPC - Nisha - Sat1

2026 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekend

27 players · average NTRP 3.66 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 9 played
Sep 5 11:30 AM
Huntington Club
Sep 6 9:00 AM
Heritage Park Tennis
Sep 12 1:00 PM
David Sills Lower Peters Canyon Park
Sep 13 10:30 AM
Marguerite Tennis Center
Sep 20 9:00 AM
Heritage Park Tennis
Sep 26 1:00 PM
David Sills Lower Peters Canyon Park
Sep 27 1:00 PM
Cerritos Tennis Center
2026-09-04vs OC YLCC - Shannon 1030Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMotomi Kawase / Allison Palme vs Sandy Swearingen / Nancy Ferguson1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesDevon Hogue / Michelle Smith vs Cathy Jackson / Terri Rasmussen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSupriya Sunder Rajan / Jenniffer Wong vs Alison Alexander / Lisabeth Grimm5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCindy Carpenter / Nancy Marcosa vs Lailai Ho / Rosette McClave4-6, 0-6
2026-08-28vs OC YLCC - Shannon 1030Won 10
W#1 DoublesVivian Nevin / Jill Hauk vs Natalie St Germain / Candice Myers6-2, 6-1
2026-08-22vs OC Heritage Park - Xuan - Sun9Won 20
W#1 DoublesDevon Hogue / Michelle Smith vs Miki Sugiura / Junko Aoki6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJosephine Chow / Megumi Kodama vs Haley Takaki / Nataliia Kuznietsova7-5, 7-5
W#1 DoublesAshley Knoblach / Cristina Hamlin vs Michelle Sinclair / Mai Gu6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesIrene Fehr / Kaeko Jenni vs Gigi Ho / Lisabeth Grimm6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTina Lu / Megumi Kodama vs Ping Hogan / CHERIE SHARP3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesSupriya Sunder Rajan / Ivy Charlton vs Kathy Kelly / Catherine Fullerton3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKaeko Jenni / Yoko Kurokawa vs Erin Nichols / Kimberly Abdelmuti6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCindy Carpenter / Nancy Marcosa vs Linda Vu / Dana Bennett2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJill Hauk / Jaala Zabrocki vs Caroline Gee / Ellen Aistars6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNisha Anish / Kristi Wechsler vs Jing Dong / Deping Liu6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCindy Carpenter / Nancy Marcosa vs Fangting Shi / Ruoqi Xiong6-0, 6-1
2026-07-10vs OC Lifetime RSC - ChrissyLost 01
L#3 DoublesRosette McClave / Allison Palme vs Jeanette Delaney / Elisa Seapy2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekend
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC Marguerite MV - Caroline - Sun10:306114717168
2OC Huntington Club - Cheryl - Sat11305115311131
3OC Heritage Park - Xuan - Sun943111025205
4OC Costa Mesa - Rosette/LaiLai Sat9237817129
5OC LPC - Nisha - Sat112451074
6OC Love All Club - Cerritos - Emily- Sun1134817123
7OC Meta Legend - Irvine HP - Debra - Sun 90621632213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 27 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Devon Hogue
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.91
3.90
Alicia Carlin
published 4
3.87
Andrea Torng
published 4
3.83
Supriya Sunder Rajan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.81
Cristina Hamlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Daniela Schardinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Jill Hauk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Michele Savoie
published
3.68
Sabrina MacLachlan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Ashley Knoblach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Monica Anderson
published
3.52
Gretchen Cuzick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Yoko Kurokawa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Shiva Shokouhi
published
3.36
Nisha Anish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Jenniffer Wong
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Ivy Charlton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Irene Fehr
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.27
Kaeko Jenni
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Kristi Wechsler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Nancy Marcosa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Allison Palme
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Megumi Kodama
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Cindy Carpenter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Josephine Chow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Tina Lu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Supriya Sunder Rajan + Andrea Torng13266% games+7.6% vs expected
Ashley Knoblach + Cristina Hamlin8357% games+5.6% vs expected
Jill Hauk + Devon Hogue3261% games+4.9% vs expected
Michele Savoie + Sabrina MacLachlan8353% games+4.9% vs expected
Cindy Carpenter + Nancy Marcosa2449% games+2.5% vs expected
Josephine Chow + Jenniffer Wong2541% gamesnot enough data
Jenniffer Wong + Irene Fehr3260% gamesnot enough data
Nisha Anish + Supriya Sunder Rajan404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Devon Hogue
73W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
4.11
4
Kristen Petrovacki
133W–41L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Alicia Carlin
8W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Andrea Torng
89W–31L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.87
3.5
Supriya Sunder Rajan
56W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.83
4
Cristina Hamlin
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Daniela Schardinger
22W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Jill Hauk
19W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.70
Michele Savoie
21W–14L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.70
4
Sabrina MacLachlan
190W–130L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Ashley Knoblach
83W–82L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Monica Anderson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Gretchen Cuzick
133W–84L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.52
Yoko Kurokawa
16W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Shiva Shokouhi
19W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Nisha Anish
27W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.36
3.5
Jenniffer Wong
200W–169L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Ivy Charlton
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.32
3.5
Irene Fehr
99W–98L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Kaeko Jenni
93W–89L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Kristi Wechsler
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Nancy Marcosa
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Allison Palme
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Megumi Kodama
15W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.78
3
Cindy Carpenter
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Josephine Chow
145W–299L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Tina Lu
23W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
0%31%69%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.