Teams

String Theory

2022 Montgomery Tri-Level 18 & Over · Montgomery Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-12-18vs I'd Hit That 3xLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnthony Sims / Bruce Knolmayer vs Sung Kim / Jim Leveque0-6, 1-6
2022-12-11vs LowLee MenSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJames Forbes / Christopher Williams vs Michael Vanderputten / Matt Baumann4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRichard McKeon / James Albert vs Kevin Ro / James Smith4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-11-29vs LowLee MenWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames Forbes / Christopher Williams vs Peter Kim / Hsuan Ou7-6, 6-6
2022-11-22vs I'd Hit That 3xLost 02
L#2 DoublesXavier Ona / Stephen Rawlings vs Michael Barnello / Simon Linder0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTony Feric / Richard McKeon vs Timothy Murphy / Bill Hartman1-6, 2-6
2022-11-14vs LowLee MenLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrett Otero / Michael Zehr vs Richard Laukitis / Corey Glocker1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Rawlings / Xavier Ona vs Matt Baumann / Michael Vanderputten6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJames Albert / Bryan Bassig vs James Smith / Ji Cha1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-10-30vs LowLee MenLost 01
L#2 DoublesBruce Knolmayer / Christopher Williams vs Matt Baumann / Surendra Babu1-6, 2-6
2022-10-27vs I'd Hit That 3xLost 01
L#3 DoublesBryan Bassig / Chris Takiar vs Bill Hartman / Andrew Brammer6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-10-19vs LowLee MenLost 01
L#2 DoublesJames Forbes / Christopher Williams vs Peter Kim / Michael Vanderputten0-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-10-16vs I'd Hit That 3xLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrett Otero / Michael Zehr vs Yuji Ohno / Thomas Kolarik3-6, 2-6
2022-10-08vs LowLee MenLost 02
L#2 DoublesBruce Knolmayer / Anthony Sims vs Christopher Grant / Matt Baumann1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBryan Bassig / Tony Feric vs Kevin Ro / Todd Templeman5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-27vs I'd Hit That 3xLost 02
L#1 DoublesMikhail Laryukhin / Michael Zehr vs Matt Galosky / Alexander Gerson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Rawlings / Xavier Ona vs Jay Anzures / Alexandre Fines3-6, 1-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Michael Zehr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Bryan Bassig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
James Forbes
published 3.5
3.43
James Wen
published 3.5
3.40
Xavier Ona
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Bruce Knolmayer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Chris Takiar
published 3.5
Christopher Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
James Albert
published 3.5
2.88
Stephen Rawlings
published
2.76
Mark Rossi
published
2.62
Richard McKeon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mikhail Laryukhin
published
Wei-Chang Yang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruce Knolmayer + Christopher Williams123 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Williams + Michael Zehr123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michael Zehr
90W–93L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Bryan Bassig
143W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
James Forbes
25W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
James Wen
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Xavier Ona
132W–118L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Bruce Knolmayer
124W–136L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Chris Takiar
14W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Christopher Williams
109W–110L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
James Albert
13W–22L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Stephen Rawlings
2W–14L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.88
Mark Rossi
13W–33L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Richard McKeon
235W–409L career · 2 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.62
Mikhail Laryukhin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wei-Chang Yang
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.