Teams

Dawson/Fish

2026 NO Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Day · 7.5 NO (40&O) Women Day

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-25vs King-Kohlman/40/7.5/NOD/NOLTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesTran Black / Rebecca Tassin vs Francesca Freudenberger / Ashley Gillen2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPaige Giavotella / Jessica Barnett vs Gretchen Drennan / Alexis Butler6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKatie Cambre / Jaime Self vs Madhavi King / Elizabeth Todd2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 7.5 NO (40&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Coco/40/7.5/CWD/GACC000000
2Clarke/Cabeceiras/40/7.5/NOD/CP000000
3Jaynes/40+/7.5/women day000000
4King-Kohlman/40/7.5/NOD/NOLTC000000
5Dawson/Fish000000
6Tafaro/Forster/40/7.5/NOD/CP000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Jessica Barnett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Rebecca Tassin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Paige Giavotella
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Tran Black
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Katie Cambre
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Amanda Dawson
published 3.5
3.25
Gloria Grass
published
3.13
Helen Fish
published
Jaime Self
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paige Giavotella + Jessica Barnett13756% games+3.7% vs expected
Gloria Grass + Tran Black224 matchesnot enough data
Gloria Grass + Helen Fish224 matchesnot enough data
Helen Galloway-Newman + Tran Black033 matchesnot enough data
Helen Galloway-Newman + Jessica Barnett033 matchesnot enough data
Tran Black + Jessica Barnett303 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Dawson + Jaime Self123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Barnett
32W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Rebecca Tassin
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Paige Giavotella
18W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Tran Black
18W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
3.30
Katie Cambre
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Helen Galloway-Newman
32W–22L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Amanda Dawson
3W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Gloria Grass
10W–10L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Helen Fish
7W–8L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Jaime Self
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.