Teams

Tri Hard

2023 Fall Adult 18 & Over Tri-Level · Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.40 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Savannah Bryson
published
4.26
Lauren Lombardo
published
Haruna Miyakado
published 4.5
4.22
Louisa Wang
published
4.12
Ashli Urano
published 4.5
4.11
Ashlyn Davis
published 4.5
4.06
Arielle Hickman
published 4.5
4.02
Kimberly Rowe
published
3.65
3.45
Tess Castleberry
published
3.38
Murphy Moon
published
Michelle Graham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arielle Hickman + Ashlyn Davis6554% games+3.6% vs expected
Haruna Miyakado + Louisa Wang314 matchesnot enough data
Haruna Miyakado + Lauren Lombardo404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Savannah Bryson
61W–15L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
Lauren Lombardo
34W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Haruna Miyakado
18W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Louisa Wang
29W–13L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Ashli Urano
22W–19L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Ashlyn Davis
51W–24L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Arielle Hickman
79W–46L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
4.06
Kimberly Rowe
20W–21L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
4.02
4
Christin Alvarado
44W–21L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Tess Castleberry
46W–44L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
Murphy Moon
73W–48L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Michelle Graham
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.