Teams

HCC The Fun Team - M. Palmer

2023 Hillsborough Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.89 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-07vs Hunters Green Giants - M. WarrenWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Voelker / Michael Palmer vs Timothy Carr / KEVIN JOHNSON6-2, 6-3
2023-08-05vs Buckhorn I'd Hit That - J. TorresLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Voelker / Rogerio Buchner de Freitas vs Thomas Ali / Chris Chee-A-Tow7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-07-13vs Buckhorn I'd Hit That - J. TorresWon 10
W#3 DoublesDerek DeBrocke / David Voelker vs Chris Eversole / Gregory Hovsepian5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-06-17vs Hills/J. Schneider/18&Over7.5MLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Voelker / Fernando Defaz vs Jose Alomar / Ralph Razon2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Etienne Aduya
published 4
3.88
Abhik Roy
published 4
3.77
Caleb Hirsch
published 4
Fernando Defaz
published 4
3.67
Bryant Moore
published 4
3.65
David Voelker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Dustin Applebaum
published 3.5
3.58
Derek DeBrocke
published 4
3.53
Alan Chin
published 3.5
3.41
Ken Chin
published
3.33
Michael Palmer
published
John Schultz
published
Kareem Marshall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Chin + Alan Chin4265% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Etienne Aduya
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Abhik Roy
17W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Caleb Hirsch
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Fernando Defaz
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Bryant Moore
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
4
David Voelker
109W–90L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Dustin Applebaum
19W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.60
4
Derek DeBrocke
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Alan Chin
22W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
Rogerio Buchner de Freitas
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
Ken Chin
21W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Michael Palmer
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
John Schultz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kareem Marshall
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.