Teams

WTC - Cook 40+ Mixed Spring

2025 Dothan USTA Mixed 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-20vs DO - CrowleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesJoseph Cason / Van Hughes vs Fidel Castillo / Karelia Castillo6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJames Phillips / Lindy Wood vs Jessica Kelley / Bradley Wright6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohnny Cook / Elizabeth Odom vs Kimberly Griger / Howard Harrison3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-14vs DO - CrowleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesDale Whittle / Van Hughes vs Jessica Kelley / Howard Harrison4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichele Andrews / Robert Lee vs Fidel Castillo / Karelia Castillo7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-04-27vs DO - CrowleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngie Mcdaniel / Dale Whittle vs Jessica Kelley / Bradley Wright4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Andrews / Robert Lee vs Dennis Leger / Jessica Deck3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJames Phillips / Lindy Wood vs Carie Crowley / Devin Snuggs6-3, 6-3
2025-04-13vs DO - CrowleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoseph Cason / Van Hughes vs Jessica Deck / Dennis Leger6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAngie Mcdaniel / Dale Whittle vs Carie Crowley / Bradley Wright6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJohnny Cook / Elizabeth Odom vs Jessica Kelley / Devin Snuggs0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Lindy Wood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Joseph Cason
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Van Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Elizabeth Odom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Johnny Cook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Angie Mcdaniel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Dale Whittle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Michele Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dale Whittle + Angie Mcdaniel224 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Odom + Johnny Cook033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindy Wood
21W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Joseph Cason
14W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Van Hughes
83W–83L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Elizabeth Odom
176W–100L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Johnny Cook
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Angie Mcdaniel
14W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Dale Whittle
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Michele Andrews
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.