Teams

Mason/18/Div1/M/BREC

2025 BR Tri-Level 18 & Over - Men · 3.5,3.0,2.5 BR (18&O) Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-16vs Antilley/18/Div1/M/BocWon 21
W#1 DoublesKeegan Stansberry / Shalin Sheth vs Brian Antilley / Bradley Meek4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Crain / Richie Sias vs Carl Jeansonne / David Fluker6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJesus Pineda / Bill Scott vs Stewart Gordon / Brumby Broussard6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-09vs Mueller/18/Div1/M/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesJesus Pineda / Bill Scott vs Conor McGuinness / Lawson Clegg2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesConrad Meijer / Jeffrey Rice vs Blake Zamjahn / DC Lipani3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Tregre / Hayden Ellis vs Brent Landry / Connor Gilbert2-6, 3-6
2025-06-25vs Kandula/18/Div1/M/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Crain / Jeffrey Rice vs Lyndon Wilbert / Timothy Dantzler1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPrasanth Pasala / Shalin Sheth vs Zach Ingram / Steve Caruso1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHayden Ellis / Keegan Stansberry vs Aaron Halstead / Caleb MacHa1-6, 4-6
2025-06-18vs Antilley/18/Div1/M/BocSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPrasanth Pasala / Shalin Sheth vs Scott Uffman / Bradley Meek6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBill Scott / Richie Sias vs Nicholas Hartman / Connell Archey3-6, 2-6
2025-06-11vs Mueller/18/Div1/M/BRECLost 02
L#1 DoublesBill Scott / Jeffrey Rice vs Lawson Clegg / Bryon Clegg0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Tregre / Hayden Ellis vs Erik Thompson / Richard Whitehead6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-06-04vs Kandula/18/Div1/M/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesBill Scott / Jeffrey Rice vs Kelly Toups / Timothy Dantzler2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichie Sias / Conrad Meijer vs Kristopher Schmoll / Charles Bernhard2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesShalin Sheth / Prasanth Pasala vs Aaron Halstead / Caleb MacHa2-6, 4-6
2025-05-21vs Antilley/18/Div1/M/BocWon 21
W#1 DoublesBill Scott / Jesus Pineda vs Connell Archey / Nicholas Hartman6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDaniel Crain / Richie Sias vs Stewart Gordon / Billy Ridge3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesShalin Sheth / Keegan Stansberry vs Brian Antilley / Bradley Meek6-4, 6-0
2025-05-14vs Mueller/18/Div1/M/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesConrad Meijer / Jesus Pineda vs Nicholas Mueller / Karsten Thompson0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPrasanth Pasala / James Mason vs Conor McGuinness / Bryon Clegg3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHayden Ellis / Keegan Stansberry vs Erik Thompson / Brent Landry6-7, 1-6
2025-05-07vs Kandula/18/Div1/M/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Crain / Conrad Meijer vs Kelly Toups / Lyndon Wilbert0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJames Mason / Prasanth Pasala vs Zach Ingram / Kristopher Schmoll2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Tregre / Shalin Sheth vs Caleb MacHa / Aaron Halstead1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5,3.0,2.5 BR (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Bill Scott
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Daniel Crain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Joseph Dronet
published
2.64
Conrad Meijer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Jesus Pineda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
2.62
Keegan Stansberry
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.61
Richie Sias
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Shalin Sheth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Hayden Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Prasanth Pasala
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.23
Matthew Tregre
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Prasanth Pasala + Shalin Sheth3344% games+4.3% vs expected
Conrad Meijer + Joseph Dronet2348% gamesnot enough data
Jesus Pineda + Bill Scott123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bill Scott
2W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Daniel Crain
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Dronet
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Conrad Meijer
6W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Jesus Pineda
12W–24L career · 10 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Keegan Stansberry
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%20%80%
2.62
Richie Sias
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
2.61
Shalin Sheth
14W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Hayden Ellis
3W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
Prasanth Pasala
13W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.35
Matthew Tregre
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.