Teams

Boulevard - Berk

2022 IRMSL TriLevel 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichele Packard / Claudia Berk vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesPenelope Chambers / Janel Griffin vs Victoria Kendall / Jane Moffat6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesMary Lunn / Claudia Berk vs Kate Cutler / Barbara Warsager6-4, 6-4
2022-04-23vs IRMSL/Nrs - MurrayLost 01
L#2 DoublesJanel Griffin / Risa StClair vs Darla Cederberg / Renee' Palmer6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Lana Heinze
published
3.69
Mary Lunn
published
3.60
Leslie London
published
3.51
Anita Venner
published 4
3.31
Cynthia Croom
published 3.5
3.30
Melissa Dean
published
3.27
Claudia Berk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Nancy Barry
published
3.10
Pia Gold
published
3.08
Jennifer Cancio
published
3.00
Janel Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Volanski
published
Michele Packard
published
Risa StClair
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Barry + Melissa Dean5067% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lana Heinze
38W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Mary Lunn
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Leslie London
47W–59L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Anita Venner
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Cynthia Croom
54W–45L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
Melissa Dean
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Claudia Berk
71W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Nancy Barry
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Pia Gold
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Cancio
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
3.08
Janel Griffin
11W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.00
Jennifer Volanski
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michele Packard
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Risa StClair
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.