Teams

BC-WestEnd/CarlosCruz-Aedo

2023 SOCAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Men - 5.0+

11 players · average NTRP 4.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-19vs BC-LLW-MiraCosta/TylerTulenkoLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Hardin / Justin DeMattos vs Rylan Rizza / Sascha Kiehne0-6, 1-6
2023-10-28vs BC-LLW-MiraCosta/TylerTulenkoLost 01
L#2 DoublesTracy Hyman / Justin DeMattos vs Nicholas Lopez / Casey Grindon1-6, 1-6
2023-10-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesTracy Hyman / Hannes Schenk vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesPablo Barajas / Tracy Hyman vs Brennan Faith / Reuben Mulhern7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-10-07vs BC-LLW-MiraCosta/TylerTulenkoLost 01
L#2 DoublesTracy Hyman / Hannes Schenk vs Casey Grindon / Sascha Kiehne1-6, 1-6
2023-09-16vs BC-LLW-MiraCosta/TylerTulenkoLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarlos Cruz-Aedo / Justin DeMattos vs Anthony Lee / Jake Ly7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 5.0+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.79
Attila Lassu
published 5
4.68
KEISUKE ABIKO
published
4.51
Tatsuya Ishizuka
published
4.44
Jacob Lapkin
published
4.30
Justin DeMattos
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.24
Carlos Cruz-Aedo
published 4.5
4.23
Evan Mobley
published
4.18
Tracy Hyman
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
Hannes Schenk
published
Jeremy Shaw
published
Pablo Barajas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carlos Cruz-Aedo + Tracy Hyman12956% gamesnot enough data
Justin DeMattos + Tracy Hyman11361% gamesnot enough data
Justin DeMattos + Carlos Cruz-Aedo2340% gamesnot enough data
Evan Mobley + Carlos Cruz-Aedo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Attila Lassu
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.79
KEISUKE ABIKO
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.68
Tatsuya Ishizuka
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.51
Jacob Lapkin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.44
4.5
Justin DeMattos
93W–48L career · 12 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Carlos Cruz-Aedo
78W–49L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
Evan Mobley
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Tracy Hyman
122W–76L career · 8 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
4.18
Hannes Schenk
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeremy Shaw
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pablo Barajas
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.