Teams

SKY PINK

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-08vs CACM REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristy Jones / Karen Guzzetta vs Julie Boes / Kailey Dellenbach2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBetsy Barringer / Julie Bock vs Sasha Parker / Courtney Kiefer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-08-01vs DTP REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesTherese Aleinikoff / Betsy Barringer vs Miki Aylesworth / Rita Urness6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMimi Pomeranz / Kim Riley vs Carole Dagnon / Eve Wall2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-07-30vs DTC PURPLEWon 10
W#1 SinglesKaren Guzzetta vs Ashley Banister-Riley6-1, 6-4
2024-07-25vs LTFC GOLDWon 20
W#1 SinglesBetsy Barringer vs Kelly Shadwick4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMimi Pomeranz / Kim Riley vs Somsi Stringer / Holly Kortum7-5, 6-2
2024-07-18vs CHCC YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesMimi Pomeranz / Karen Guzzetta vs Kelly Osborn / Katie Reed6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBetsy Barringer vs Maureen Kechriotis6-2, 6-0
2024-07-11vs CACM BLACKWon 10
W#2 DoublesMimi Pomeranz / Betsy Barringer vs Andrea Puschaver / Jill Barghelame4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-06-27vs GCC TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesMimi Pomeranz / Betsy Barringer vs Michelle Belitz / Shannon Johnson4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Karen Guzzetta
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.77
Heather Bacon
published
3.71
Betsy Barringer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Mimi Pomeranz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.51
Christy Jones
published 3.5
3.44
Kim Riley
published
3.23
Julie Bock
published
Therese Aleinikoff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mimi Pomeranz + Betsy Barringer191854% games+3.3% vs expected
Mimi Pomeranz + Karen Guzzetta303 matchesnot enough data
Mimi Pomeranz + Heather Bacon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen Guzzetta
75W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
Heather Bacon
16W–15L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Betsy Barringer
60W–66L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Mimi Pomeranz
97W–73L career · 5 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Christy Jones
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
Kim Riley
15W–25L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.44
Julie Bock
6W–17L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Therese Aleinikoff
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.