Teams

LATA18/Wilson/LCC

2025 Combo 18 & Over-STA · Adult Women - 5.5

13 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-28vs LATA18/Nunnery/QVLost 12
W#1 DoublesKelley Leddy / Neely Spate vs Jeanie Farmer / Kelley Parr6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTraci Suber / Kellie Corbett vs Tara Rogers / Nonie Morris5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesValeri Wilson / Ashley Quell vs Reka Corley / Jamie Fite3-6, 3-6
2025-08-25vs LATA18/Jeffcoat/CAMPLost 02
L#1 DoublesTraci Suber / Carolina Lemos vs Morgan Sweeney / Becky Piper0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Marcott / Kellie Corbett vs Chrissy Boone / Molly Price2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Megan Fredrickson
published
3.02
Traci Suber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Valeri Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Theresa Marcott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Katherine Merrell
published
2.69
Chelsea Kellis
published 3
2.66
Brenda Murphy
published 3
2.52
Neely Spate
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Kellie Corbett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Ashley Quell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.28
Kate Newsom
published
2.24
Ella Stilwell
published
Kelley Leddy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Traci Suber + Valeri Wilson7452% games+5.7% vs expected
Kellie Corbett + Ella Stilwell134 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Murphy + Traci Suber314 matchesnot enough data
Neely Spate + Ashley Quell314 matchesnot enough data
Megan Fredrickson + Valeri Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Fredrickson
22W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Traci Suber
45W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Valeri Wilson
34W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%38%
2.96
Theresa Marcott
25W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Katherine Merrell
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Chelsea Kellis
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Brenda Murphy
41W–47L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
Neely Spate
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
0%44%56%
2.52
Kellie Corbett
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%62%38%
2.46
2.5
Ashley Quell
9W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%69%31%
2.43
Kate Newsom
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.28
Ella Stilwell
10W–25L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Kelley Leddy
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.