Teams

JThaker/KStepp (BCC)

2024 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-29vs BMarks (Providence CC)Won 20
W#2 DoublesJennifer Meads / Jigisha Thaker vs Kate Schumacher / Maggie Webb1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSiobhan Papa / Sheri Newman vs Stacy Figgs Sokhi / Helen Daly1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-22vs ABVanMeter (Southampton)Won 10
W#1 DoublesChantal Powers / Stacie Gornet vs Anne-Bee van Meter / Pamela Hatch6-2, 6-4
2024-04-08vs JCarnahan (Palisades)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJigisha Thaker / Jennifer Meads vs Danielle Lehman / Pamela Faile2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-03-25vs EBrandon (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Stepp / Chantal Powers vs Yvette Gama / Suzy Sandbo5-7, 5-7
2024-03-18vs SBrown/KWagner (OPRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesStacie Gornet / Jigisha Thaker vs Nicole Woodley / Erin Lentz7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSheri Newman / Heather Barker vs Deana Deep / Stacey Brown4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-03-11vs JHerlong/LOcallaghan (FCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStacie Gornet / Chantal Powers vs Johanne Bulger / Tammy Ward2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-03-04vs KLull (Blakeney)Split 11
W#1 DoublesChantal Powers / Stacie Gornet vs Dorothy Garrity / Deepti Dua6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesSheri Newman vs Mildred Deely3-6, 4-6
2024-02-26vs SStorck (Rama)Split 11
L#1 DoublesChantal Powers / Sheri Newman vs Stephanie Gossert / Teri Snoke4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Schneider / Jigisha Thaker vs Katie Monson / Katherine Jay6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Sonia Waters
published
3.31
Kathleen Stepp
published
3.23
Heather Barker
published
3.22
Jennifer Meads
published
3.17
Chantal Powers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.12
Jigisha Thaker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Siobhan Papa
published
2.98
Gaye Holmes
published
2.96
Sheri Newman
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheri Newman + Chantal Powers3356% gamesnot enough data
Gaye Holmes + Sheri Newman213 matchesnot enough data
Jigisha Thaker + Sheri Newman123 matchesnot enough data
Sheri Newman + Kathleen Stepp123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sonia Waters
20W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
Kathleen Stepp
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.31
Heather Barker
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Jennifer Meads
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.22
3.5
Chantal Powers
29W–67L career · 8 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Jigisha Thaker
64W–65L career · 6 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.12
Siobhan Papa
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.09
Gaye Holmes
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Sheri Newman
71W–62L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.