Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Cracroft/Hall

2022 Winter League-Weekday · 3.5W AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.31 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-15vs Ogden-Love/MillerLost 13
L#1 DoublesStephanie Benton / Kirsten Lewis vs Sarah Love / Heidi Maxfield6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarilee Cracroft / Sharon Larkin vs Maria Lombardi / Michelle Maxfield3-6, 3-4
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Cottle / Melanie Decker vs Carrie Johnson / Debi Johnson2-6, 0-6
W#4 DoublesAlison Pearce / Yaeko Bryner vs Isabel Cristina Lau / Jamie Tate2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesBecky Hall / Martina Stewart vs Mary Kathryn Harman / Kim Cronin6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Cottle vs Emily Benton4-6, 4-5
W#2 DoublesStephanie Benton / Kirsten Lewis vs Jessica Gardner / Dalynn Thomas6-3, 5-4
L#3 DoublesNancy Sparrer / Marilee Cracroft vs Lisa Stebbing / Chandi Hurd0-6, 5-6
L#4 DoublesMelanie Decker / Yaeko Bryner vs Julie Hall / Diane Creamer3-6, 0-6
2022-03-01vs Ace Athletics-GoaslindLost 14
L#1 DoublesMartina Stewart / Carla Stoddard vs Deanne Goaslind / Megan Schey6-7, 2-4
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Cottle vs Jocelyn Pearson3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKirsten Lewis / Cathy Philpot vs Kristen Holm / Connie Marshall6-4, 4-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBecky Hall / Marilee Cracroft vs Alyssa Larson / Jenny DeWaal4-6, 4-3, 1-0
L#4 DoublesStephanie Benton / Melanie Decker vs Alison Beesley / Lindsay Andersen5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-02-22vs Sunpro-Parker/KoehleLost 13
W#1 DoublesCarla Stoddard / Marilee Cracroft vs Lindsey Ramage / Suzette Greer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlison Pearce / Carolyn Cottle vs Jennifer Stringham / Lori Curtis2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Larkin / Yaeko Bryner vs Katri Koehle / Kim Santiago2-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesMelanie Decker / Staci Dansie vs Sherston Faux / Rachel Bunker3-6, 2-6
2022-02-15vs Sports Mall-Henderson/KnowltonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMary Harrison / Nancy Sparrer vs Esther Hatch / Shauna Lake2-6, 5-6
W#2 DoublesBecky Hall / Martina Stewart vs Claudine Finlay / Britany Egan7-5, 2-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSharon Larkin / Carla Stoddard vs Debra Knowlton / Stacy Criddle7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesKirsten Lewis / Cathy Philpot vs Michelle Edwards / Nicole Reese6-4, 3-5, 0-1
2022-02-08vs Ivory Ridge-Allen/MadsenLost 14
L#1 DoublesNancy Sparrer / Kirsten Lewis vs Cary Jones / Whitni Skousen3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMary Harrison vs Bessy Nielson5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Benton / Alison Pearce vs Amy Allen / Angela Bleak1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Larkin / Yaeko Bryner vs Catherine Peterson / Stephanie Conlee4-6, 2-4
W#4 DoublesCarolyn Cottle / Melanie Decker vs Jennifer Hardin / Jennifer Burke6-2, 6-1
2022-02-01vs RISE AC-Mower/LongsonLost 05
L#1 DoublesNancy Sparrer / Kirsten Lewis vs Nikki Mower / Sara Johnson3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMary Harrison vs Natalie Stobbe3-6, 3-4
L#2 DoublesSharon Larkin / Martina Stewart vs Glenna Frey / Mary Silver3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarilee Cracroft / Carla Stoddard vs Nicole Garff / Stacey Schmerse2-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesStephanie Benton / Carolyn Cottle vs Shelley Petersen / Aubrey Pluim1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-01-25vs Ogden-Love/MillerLost 04
L#1 DoublesBecky Hall / Nancy Sparrer vs Maria Lombardi / Michelle Maxfield2-5
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Cottle / Kirsten Lewis vs Sarah Love / Debi Johnson6-7, 3-4
L#3 DoublesStephanie Benton / Mary Harrison vs Jacki Joseph / Jamie Tate4-6, 4-3, 1-0
L#4 DoublesMelanie Decker / Yaeko Bryner vs Tana Coleman / Jennie Stacey2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 3.5W AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sunpro-Burns/Fillmore81291636315
2CMTA @ Liberty Park-Swensen/Sampson71261433303
3Ogden-Love/Miller71281235307
4Sunpro-Parker/Koehle62271332297
5CMTA @ Liberty Park-Simmons/Despain63271844377
6CMTA @ Liberty Park-Leishman63232251389
7RISE AC-Mower/Longson53271332287
8Golds Gym-Richards/Lund54261944333
9CMTA @ Liberty Park-Assemi/Handlon54222350380
10Ace Athletics-Goaslind35152555369
11Ivory Ridge-Allen/Madsen26152553374
12Sports Mall-Hall/Phinney27182759408
13Sunpro-Westover/Barber18172859408
14Salt Lake Tennis-Cracroft/Hall0883269415

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Stephanie Benton
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Becky Hall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Carolyn Cottle
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #4 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.08
Carla Stoddard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Alison Pearce
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3.5
2.91
Mary Harrison
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Nancy Sparrer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.84
Marilee Cracroft
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.49
Staci Dansie
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Melanie Decker
usually #4 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
Cathy Philpot
published
Kirsten Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Martina Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sharon Larkin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Yaeko Bryner
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Sparrer + Kirsten Lewis2747% games+9.3% vs expected
Becky Hall + Stephanie Benton2552% games+8.5% vs expected
Sharon Larkin + Martina Stewart3458% games+3.4% vs expected
Sharon Larkin + Carla Stoddard213745% games−4.1% vs expected
Becky Hall + Kirsten Lewis3548% games−5.6% vs expected
Sharon Larkin + Mary Harrison21036% games−6.1% vs expected
Nancy Sparrer + Mary Harrison31037% games−6.2% vs expected
Carla Stoddard + Marilee Cracroft4741% games−10.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Benton
57W–48L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Becky Hall
189W–166L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Carolyn Cottle
113W–130L career · 7 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Carla Stoddard
124W–150L career · 4 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Alison Pearce
171W–202L career · 11 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.06
Mary Harrison
25W–76L career · 4 lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
2.91
3.5
Nancy Sparrer
28W–101L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Marilee Cracroft
55W–130L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Staci Dansie
50W–155L career · 1 line in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
Melanie Decker
49W–170L career · 6 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.42
Cathy Philpot
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kirsten Lewis
14W–28L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Martina Stewart
20W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Larkin
93W–206L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Yaeko Bryner
11W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.