Teams

HCC Tampa Sets Addicts - D. Hazama

2022 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-05vs Hills - Sun City Center/GreenleeLost 01
L#1 DoublesIrene Nasworthy / Sondra Heiken vs Paige Lowery-Haggbloom / Janet Tetreault6-7, 2-6
2022-02-26vs Cheval - D. JacksonWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaurie Smith / Kim Blackmore vs Mary Paul / Patricia McCullough6-3, 7-5
2022-02-12vs Apollo Beach - R. KenyonLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurie Smith / Xiao Zhang vs Debra Bell / Rene Kenyon2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesIrene Nasworthy / Maribel Gross vs Debra Whiteside / Mary Beth Sultenfuss6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLeah Knapp / Dori Hazama vs Theresa Anderson / Janet George6-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesLaurie Smith / Gina Morgan vs Aurora Finucane / Angela Piche6-7, 5-7
2022-01-29vs Plant City AcesWon 20
W#2 DoublesMaribel Gross / Irene Nasworthy vs Rachel Ray / Sonya Braudway6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesXiao Zhang / Laurie Smith vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-01-08vs Cheval - D. JacksonWon 10
W#1 DoublesXiao Zhang / Laurie Smith vs Mary Schmitt / Brenda Kunkel6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Patty Halstead
published
3.78
Irene Nasworthy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Melissa Sheridan
published
3.62
Laurie Smith
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.25
Maribel Gross
published
3.25
Dori Hazama
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Danielle Haggar
published 3.5
3.01
Teresa Thompson
published
Xiao Zhang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Sheridan + Patty Halstead7263% games+5.0% vs expected
Teresa Thompson + Irene Nasworthy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patty Halstead
15W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Irene Nasworthy
186W–103L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
Melissa Sheridan
24W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Laurie Smith
232W–110L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Maribel Gross
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Dori Hazama
199W–167L career · 1 line in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Danielle Haggar
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Teresa Thompson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.01
Xiao Zhang
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.