Teams

Kapil 4.0M40

2025 USTA League Adult 40 & Over - Fall 2024- HSV · 4.0 MEN 40N1S3D

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-05vs GilliesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Grace / Tom Snoddy vs Charles Brinkley / Yeong Seon Kim6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGregory Chando vs Scott Gillies6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDouglas Counter / Scott Schnorrenberg vs Brian Lee / Christopher Chapman6-2, 6-0
2024-11-05vs Sargent 4-OhhWon 31
L#1 DoublesScott Schnorrenberg / Graham Burgess vs James Steele / Craig Satterfeal7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGregory Chando vs Ross Sargent6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKapil Pant / Tom Snoddy vs Nelson Bond / Keith Jiminez3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Pensa / Greg Clark vs Mark Sommers / John Smith6-0, 6-4
2024-10-30vs GilliesWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Schnorrenberg / Graham Burgess vs Scott Gillies / Yeong Seon Kim6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGregory Chando vs NADESH RAMROOP6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Harbarger / Jon Scallan vs Christopher Chapman / Joe Moorman4-6, 6-7
2024-10-15vs Sargent 4-OhhLost 13
L#1 DoublesGreg Clark / Robert Pensa vs Keith Jiminez / Alejandro Vasquez4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGregory Chando vs Ross Sargent4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristopher Gainer / John Grace vs Craig Satterfeal / James Steele2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTim Schlichter / Tom Snoddy vs John Smith / Mark Sommers6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2024-10-12vs GilliesWon 21
L#1 DoublesKapil Pant / David Harbarger vs Yeong Seon Kim / Charles Brinkley7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTim Schlichter / Gregory Chando vs Christopher Chapman / Katsuak Sasaki6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn Grace / Jon Scallan vs Scott Gillies / Terry Pe6-4, 7-5
2024-10-01vs Sargent 4-OhhSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJohn Grace / Tim Schlichter vs John Smith / Jay Mandal2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesGregory Chando vs Ross Sargent6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGreg Clark / Robert Pensa vs Andrew Tichow / Craig Satterfeal6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Harbarger / Alan Nettles vs James Steele / Mark Sommers5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN 40N1S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Greg Clark
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.98
Christopher Gainer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.97
Scott Schnorrenberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
Gregory Chando
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.92
Tham Duong
published
3.85
Tom Snoddy
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
John Grace
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.69
Robert Pensa
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Douglas Counter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Graham Burgess
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Kapil Pant
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Tim Schlichter
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Jon Scallan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Alan Nettles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Graham Burgess + Scott Schnorrenberg9364% games+14.6% vs expected
Tom Snoddy + Robert Pensa5062% games+7.7% vs expected
Robert Pensa + Greg Clark10361% games+2.6% vs expected
Tom Snoddy + Douglas Counter5354% games+0.3% vs expected
Tom Snoddy + Gregory Chando5057% games−2.3% vs expected
Tom Snoddy + Kapil Pant3446% games−3.1% vs expected
Tom Snoddy + Tim Schlichter3544% games−16.7% vs expected
John Grace + Tim Schlichter2545% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Greg Clark
64W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.98
4
Christopher Gainer
131W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Scott Schnorrenberg
30W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
Gregory Chando
62W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Tham Duong
34W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Tom Snoddy
63W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.85
John Grace
53W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Robert Pensa
41W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Douglas Counter
20W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Graham Burgess
43W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.64
Kapil Pant
16W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Tim Schlichter
33W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Jon Scallan
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Alan Nettles
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.