Teams

Sanlando-Larrousse/Phantoms7.5

2026 ORANGESEMINOLE Combo 18 & Over-Summer Day · 7.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 7 played
Sep 12 9:00 AM
Sanlando Park
2026-09-05vs Sanlando-Vuong 7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesMark Rose / Joel Jimenez vs Tim Thomas / Carlos Rodriguez7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWANDERLEY TREVISAN / Quang Le vs John Olcese / Richard Cooper7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRichard van Smith / Ryan Kaupe vs Jose Perez / Scott Sullivan6-2, 6-4
2026-08-30vs Sanlando-Vuong 7.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesRob Haben / Ryan Kaupe vs Jose Perez / Joel Montes6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWANDERLEY TREVISAN / Quang Le vs Nestor Garcia Pulido / Carlos Rodriguez7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesChristoph Beck / Joseph Massot vs Libardo Lambrano / Tim Thomas2-3
2026-08-25vs Ft Gatlin-MassadWon 21
W#1 DoublesRaul Larrousse / Ryan Kaupe vs CARLOS GUERRERO / Ernie Rivera4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRichard van Smith / Joseph Massot vs Zack Brasher / William Vazquez7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesWANDERLEY TREVISAN / Joel Jimenez vs Damaso Marcano / Sean Allen1-3
2026-08-22vs Ft Gatlin-MassadWon 21
W#1 DoublesRaul Larrousse / Ryan Kaupe vs Zack Brasher / Sean Allen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard van Smith / Marco Esteves vs CARLOS GUERRERO / Ernie Rivera3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMark Rose / Joel Jimenez vs Blaise Fischbach / William Vazquez6-3, 7-6
2026-08-02vs Ft Gatlin-MassadWon 21
W#1 DoublesWANDERLEY TREVISAN / Quang Le vs Zack Brasher / William Vazquez6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristoph Beck / Marco Esteves vs CARLOS GUERRERO / Ernie Rivera3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRob Haben / Ryan Kaupe vs Carlos Salguero / Guido Schutz6-2, 6-1
2026-07-25vs Sanlando-Vuong 7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesRaul Larrousse / Ryan Kaupe vs Nestor Garcia Pulido / Joel Montes6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRichard van Smith / Gus Temple vs Tim Thomas / Scott Sullivan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristoph Beck / Joel Jimenez vs Jose Perez / Libardo Lambrano6-3, 6-4
2026-06-27vs Sanlando-Vuong 7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesRob Haben / Gus Temple vs Jose Perez / Carlos Puyo6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRichard van Smith / Marco Esteves vs Nestor Garcia Pulido / Tracy Gill3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWANDERLEY TREVISAN / Quang Le vs Jake Qu / Scott Sullivan6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sanlando-Larrousse/Phantoms7.53081673
2Ft Gatlin-Massad2172767
3Sanlando-Vuong 7.50401224141

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Rob Haben
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Christoph Beck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Raul Larrousse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Richard van Smith
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.54
Mark Rose
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Gus Temple
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.49
WANDERLEY TREVISAN
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.48
Marco Esteves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Quang Le
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.45
Joseph Massot
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Ryan Kaupe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Joel Jimenez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joel Jimenez + Joseph Massot5064% games+3.6% vs expected
Christoph Beck + Raul Larrousse13656% games+2.7% vs expected
Quang Le + WANDERLEY TREVISAN404 matchesnot enough data
Christoph Beck + Richard van Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Christoph Beck + WANDERLEY TREVISAN213 matchesnot enough data
Raul Larrousse + Richard van Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Raul Larrousse + Ryan Kaupe303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rob Haben
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Christoph Beck
51W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Raul Larrousse
115W–67L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Richard van Smith
28W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.65
Mark Rose
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Gus Temple
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
WANDERLEY TREVISAN
13W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Marco Esteves
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Quang Le
26W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Joseph Massot
19W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45
Ryan Kaupe
26W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
Joel Jimenez
65W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.