Teams

WI Adult 55&O 6.0 W GML FLAC Muldoon

2022 WI Adult 55 & Over · WI Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-27vs WI Adult 55&O 6.0 W GML FLAC NassLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaria Jaffe / Debra Klement-Thomas vs Kathy Kort / Sandra Nass0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJeanne Trowbridge / Mary Ellen O'Neill vs Joy Asta / Kay Beck4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMary McDonnell / Mary Kay Kaufmann vs Jeri Spangler / Susan Hodgman6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesCynthia Muldoon / Debra Klement-Thomas vs Heidi Rozman / Kate Carroll2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElisabeth Partyka / Mary Kay Kaufmann vs Mary Sica Manders / Debra Kangas2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJeanne Trowbridge / Mary Kay Kaufmann vs Mary Ellison / Kathleen Kas-Amby6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Muldoon / Maria Jaffe vs Jane Schrimpf / Stephanie Jansen3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDiana Molnar / Mary Ellen O'Neill vs Dee Hollstein-Pizur / Arlene Adams4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-07-06vs WI Adult 55&O 6.0 W GML FLAC NassLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeanne Trowbridge / Mary Ellen O'Neill vs Kathy Kort / Joy Asta6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaria Jaffe / Elisabeth Partyka vs Jeri Spangler / Susan Hodgman3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCynthia Muldoon / Diana Molnar vs Kay Beck / Diane Schuchardt2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJeanne Trowbridge / Mary Ellen O'Neill vs Karen Banaszak / Teresa Holsen1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaria Jaffe / Cynthia Muldoon vs Debra Kangas / Cynthia Klenk4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Molnar / Elisabeth Partyka vs Linda Balthazor / Kathryn Tweet4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesElisabeth Partyka / Cynthia Muldoon vs Linda Curtis / Stephanie Jansen3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMary Kay Kaufmann / Mary McDonnell vs Mary Ellison / Victoria McCormick6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDebra Klement-Thomas / Judith Bare vs Dee Hollstein-Pizur / Arlene Adams0-6, 3-6
2022-06-15vs WI Adult 55&O 6.0 W GML FLAC NassLost 12
L#1 DoublesCynthia Muldoon / Maria Jaffe vs Joy Asta / Kathy Kort1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJeanne Trowbridge / Mary Kay Kaufmann vs Diane Schuchardt / Nancy Bucuk6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMary McDonnell / Debra Klement-Thomas vs Ramona Elmer / Patricia Rzyski5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesCynthia Muldoon / Maria Jaffe vs Karen Banaszak / Robin Cervero1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Klement-Thomas / Mary McDonnell vs Beth Hlava / Kathryn Tweet0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJudith Bare / Patricia Hurley vs Cynthia Klenk / Anne OCallaghan2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesMaria Jaffe / Elisabeth Partyka vs Kathleen Kas-Amby / Christine Bessler2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeanne Trowbridge / Debra Klement-Thomas vs Jane Mlenar / Linda Curtis5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMary Ellen O'Neill / Diana Molnar vs Victoria McCormick / Janice Gardetto6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.64
Diana Molnar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Elisabeth Partyka
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.42
Cynthia Muldoon
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
1.86
Debra Klement-Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jeanne Trowbridge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jonathan Teune
published
Maria Jaffe
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Mary Ellen O'Neill
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Mary Kay Kaufmann
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Patricia Hurley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Muldoon + Maria Jaffe044 matchesnot enough data
Diana Molnar + Mary Ellen O'Neill213 matchesnot enough data
Diana Molnar + Elisabeth Partyka033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ellen O'Neill + Jeanne Trowbridge033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diana Molnar
5W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
2.64
2.5
Elisabeth Partyka
21W–38L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%35%65%
2.55
3
Cynthia Muldoon
11W–44L career · 7 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.42
2.5
Debra Klement-Thomas
12W–103L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Jeanne Trowbridge
27W–18L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jonathan Teune
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maria Jaffe
2W–10L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Ellen O'Neill
2W–9L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Kay Kaufmann
11W–13L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Patricia Hurley
18W–32L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.