Teams

Foehrkolb - Doubles Jeopardy

2025 Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over · Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.93 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-28vs IoannouSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary McClelland / Michael Apanius vs Virginia Fung / Abid Ghori2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Seidl / Bimal Thapa vs Richard Grace / Regina Roesner6-3, 6-3
2025-03-21vs Penn Ball WizardsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristin Seidl / Michael Apanius vs Vicki Williamson / Daniel Bryant3-6, 5-7
2025-03-15vs BmoreCha8.0 18xLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandra Kick / Michael Apanius vs Maraya Pratt / Joseph Kowalczyk1-6, 3-6
2025-02-23vs IoannouLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Kick / Michael Apanius vs Christopher Morphew / Virginia Fung3-6, 2-6
2025-01-31vs Penn Ball WizardsWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichael Apanius / Lisa Siraganian vs Madison Simmons / Neil Shipman6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCameron Widdoss / Kristin Seidl vs Karen Robertson / Richard Martin6-4, 6-3
2025-01-11vs Lewis - Don the LineWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Apanius / Sandra Kick vs James Wroe / Rita Piel6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Samuel Honegger
published
3.97
Natalie Bryson
published
3.97
Danielle Barry
published 4.5
3.80
Bimal Thapa
published 4
3.77
Cyril Bansah
published 4
3.73
Mary McClelland
published
3.70
Lisa Siraganian
published
3.69
Michael Apanius
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Sandra Kick
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.31
Tracy Flaherty
published
3.21
Kevin Foehrkolb
published 3.5
3.05
Kristin Seidl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Kick + Michael Apanius123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samuel Honegger
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.20
Natalie Bryson
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.97
4.5
Danielle Barry
9W–25L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Bimal Thapa
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Cyril Bansah
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.77
Mary McClelland
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Lisa Siraganian
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Michael Apanius
74W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
4
Sandra Kick
97W–89L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Tracy Flaherty
12W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Kevin Foehrkolb
50W–90L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Kristin Seidl
66W–77L career · 6 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.