Teams

BBTC - Fitzgerald

2026 Mixed 18 & Over-GC · 3.5 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-01vs BBTC - Matthews 3.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesCraig Brown / Jackie Orgler vs Barbara Duvall / Corey Creel6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJay Simpson / Tamara Moody vs Jaime Denmark / Thiery Hicks1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTracie Normand / Emrik Allen vs Christopher Randall / Brianna Beesley0-6, 0-6
2026-06-17vs Biloxi McCarrollLost 03
L#1 DoublesJay Simpson / Tamara Moody vs Daisy Watson McCarroll / Matthew Borne2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Fitzgerald / Craig Brown vs Logan Gibson / Carly Bankston1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSteven Warren / Gloria Doty vs Wayne Dinh / Jacqui Alegria1-6, 1-6
2026-06-11vs Fish BBTC 18Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJackie Orgler / Stuart Munn vs Damien Colbet / Gwen Urbati6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJay Simpson / Tamara Moody vs Matthew Brashier / Tina Pridgen6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCraig Brown / Amy Knight vs Kevin Fish / LeAnn Davis3-6, 3-6
2026-06-03vs BBTC - PatinWon 21
L#1 DoublesJay Simpson / Tamara Moody vs Bobby Gillon / Lauren Patin3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCraig Brown / Jackie Orgler vs Tyler Patin / Joni Creel6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEmrik Allen / Kathleen Fitzgerald vs Steven Creel / Angie Cagle4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Jackie Orgler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.18
Jay Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Kathleen Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Tracie Normand
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Eric Letonoff
published
2.90
Craig Brown
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Gloria Doty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Tamara Moody
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Steven Warren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Emrik Allen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stuart Munn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara Moody + Jay Simpson7551% games+13.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jackie Orgler
13W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.40
Jay Simpson
18W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Kathleen Fitzgerald
9W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Tracie Normand
11W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Eric Letonoff
10W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Craig Brown
29W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
Gloria Doty
10W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
0%1%99%
2.82
Tamara Moody
27W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Steven Warren
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Emrik Allen
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stuart Munn
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.