Teams

Dickson/Worrell/LR/LRAC

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 3.5 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-21vs Fike/LR/RebsWon 30
W#1 DoublesHarold Specht / Elaine Bultena vs Reginald Brown / Evelyn Brown6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKathy Robinson / Gary Tharp vs Robert Lee / Brenda Scheffler6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPaul Bowersock / Jessica Donahue vs Marc Sherman / Denise Martin6-1, 6-4
2026-07-18vs Fike/LR/RebsWon 21
W#1 DoublesElaine Bultena / Harold Specht vs Evelyn Brown / Reginald Brown7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathy Robinson / Keith Montgomery vs Sarah Hugen / Rick Dickey4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJessica Donahue / Paul Bowersock vs Schelle Fike / Robert Lee6-1, 6-1
2026-07-11vs Hoskyn/NLR/BPLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Worrell / Keith Montgomery vs Robbie Rutherford / Roger Weldon2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLisa Breeding / Harold Specht vs Dean Worley / Christine Althoff3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJessica Donahue / Paul Bowersock vs Jill Childers / Stan Belue6-2, 6-4
2026-07-07vs Golden/Stewart/OCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKeith Montgomery / Kim Worrell vs Sonjia Loftis / Jamey Sapp7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathy Robinson / Paul Bowersock vs Lamona Gunter / DOUG GOLDEN3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElaine Bultena / Gary Tharp vs Denise Patrick / Keith Fletcher6-4, 6-4
2026-06-24vs Beavers/LR/ChenalWon 30
W#1 DoublesKim Worrell / Pete Tanguay vs Kelli Beavers / Darren Beavers1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElaine Bultena / Paul Bowersock vs Melissa Riddle / Mark Duch6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Breeding / Harold Specht vs Tracy Webb / Kirk Grynwald6-1, 6-3
2026-06-19vs Richard/LR/BPWon 30
W#1 DoublesTrudy Pascale / Keith Montgomery vs Anthony Kovacevic / Joanna Hladun Newkirk6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKim Worrell / Harold Specht vs Laura Feng / Guillermo Almeida7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathy Robinson / Pete Tanguay vs Judy Furnish / Terry Richard7-6, 3-5
2026-06-10vs Beavers/LR/ChenalLost 12
W#1 DoublesPaul Bowersock / Jessica Donahue vs Jennifer Walls / Mark Duch6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKim Worrell / Harold Specht vs Darren Beavers / Melissa Riddle3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElaine Bultena / Gary Tharp vs Lisa Byrd / Kirk Grynwald4-6, 5-7
2026-06-06vs Hoskyn/NLR/BPLost 12
W#1 DoublesHarold Specht / Kim Worrell vs Dean Worley / Christine Althoff6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGary Tharp / Elaine Bultena vs Bobby Perry / Ann Perry3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPaul Bowersock / Jessica Donahue vs Milli Stanley / Stan Belue4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Golden/Stewart/OC62141021201
2Dickson/Worrell/LR/LRAC5317716196
3Hoskyn/NLR/BP53121226230
4Richard/LR/BP44131126247
5Beavers/LR/Chenal44111326220
6Fike/LR/Rebs0851941268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Trudy Pascale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Pete Tanguay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Gary Tharp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Harold Specht
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.36
Elaine Bultena
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Kim Worrell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Paul Bowersock
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.29
Jessica Donahue
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.25
Keith Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.24
Maureen Dickson
published
3.15
Lisa Breeding
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Donahue + Paul Bowersock4172% gamesnot enough data
Kim Worrell + Harold Specht213 matchesnot enough data
Gary Tharp + Elaine Bultena123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trudy Pascale
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.54
Pete Tanguay
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.51
Gary Tharp
16W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Harold Specht
17W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Elaine Bultena
18W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
Kim Worrell
32W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Paul Bowersock
12W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Jessica Donahue
17W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Keith Montgomery
11W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
Maureen Dickson
8W–11L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
Lisa Breeding
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.