Teams

LEBTC PINK

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-14vs HFII GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Crawley / Rhea McMahon vs Paige Jones / Anna Carmody3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLuci Ottati vs DNita Andrews7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Logsdon / Kristen Swenson vs Brandi Renick-Smith / Liz Epstein Smith6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaurien Hottman / Stephanie Fry vs Amy Kinney / Clare Ambrose6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-07-07vs KC-CC NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesKelly Crawley / Tracy Mohrman vs Michelle Ziemian / Erin Barnett6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesLuci Ottati vs Brenna Simpson1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRhea McMahon / Laurien Hottman vs Anne Fox / Lana Banbury2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Fry / Karen Logsdon vs Kate LeClair / Marnie Desmarteau6-7, 2-6
2026-06-30vs WC NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesMarissa Murray / Luci Ottati vs Jamelle Leyden / Kate Mayoss6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesChristy Dobson vs Robin Carroll2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLaurien Hottman / Kristen Swenson vs Doreen Rogers / Melissa Klein6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRhea McMahon / Stephanie Fry vs Andrea Milanovich / Amy Curd6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2026-06-23vs LEBTC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesKelly Crawley / Tracy Mohrman vs Rebecca Duque / Carla Gamet3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChristy Dobson vs Kristine Maleri6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLuci Ottati / Marissa Murray vs Kelly Lessman / Elaine Gailloux6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaurien Hottman / Rhea McMahon vs Hanne Schauer / Sarah Phillips5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-16vs HRCA-N REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKaren Logsdon / Laurien Hottman vs Michele Regis / Corinne Flemister5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesChristy Dobson vs Piper Vitale6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarissa Murray / Kristen Swenson vs Carey Devin / Michelle Millet6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Crawley / Tracy Mohrman vs Gena Erwin / Debbie Lew4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-09vs LTFC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Crawley / Tracy Mohrman vs Cathie Frazzini / Melissa King5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristy Dobson vs Adrienne Jaycox2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Logsdon / Kristen Swenson vs Phuong Palmeiro / Megan Ryall6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephanie Fry / Marissa Murray vs Ashley Agrelius / Lori Bowling6-2, 7-6
2026-06-02vs SS-H BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesTracy Mohrman / Karen Logsdon vs Sesha Carbonaro / Mia Settlemire0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLuci Ottati vs Kiersten Paul2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRhea McMahon / Marissa Murray vs Marty Smith / Jill Geist6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristen Swenson / Stephanie Fry vs Ann Grace / Inge Bentz2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Luci Ottati
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.69
Marissa Murray
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.68
Karen Logsdon
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.67
Christy Dobson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.65
Laurien Hottman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Kelly Crawley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.64
Tracy Mohrman
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.55
Rhea McMahon
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
Kristen Swenson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.25
Stephanie Fry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Mohrman + Rhea McMahon4169% games+15.8% vs expected
Laurien Hottman + Luci Ottati5166% games+14.1% vs expected
Stephanie Fry + Rhea McMahon5060% games+10.0% vs expected
Marissa Murray + Luci Ottati5152% games+8.5% vs expected
Tracy Mohrman + Kelly Crawley251355% games+4.7% vs expected
Laurien Hottman + Rhea McMahon441658% games+0.6% vs expected
Laurien Hottman + Kelly Crawley9064% games−0.5% vs expected
Rhea McMahon + Kelly Crawley10555% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Luci Ottati
45W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Marissa Murray
38W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.69
Karen Logsdon
21W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Christy Dobson
79W–37L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Laurien Hottman
175W–49L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Kelly Crawley
129W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Tracy Mohrman
63W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.64
3.5
Rhea McMahon
104W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Kristen Swenson
20W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Stephanie Fry
33W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.