Teams

Guillet/18s/3.5,3.0,2.5/COQ

2025 Man · Cov Tri Level 18 & Over - Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 2.88 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-14Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Olivier / Jennifer Jett vs Erin Roy / Lacey Schwab1-6, 0-6
2025-07-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Harty / Jennifer Jett vs Chelsea Clement / Paige Butler6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Cov Tri Level 18 & Over - Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Schof/18s/3.5,3.0,2.5/SC Night7121311147
2Bonanno-Burns/18s/3.5,3.0,2.5/PAC6217718187
3Anzalone/18s/3.5,3.0,2.5/NC44111326191
4Greer-Bouche/18s/3.5,3.0,2.5/PAC2681637251
5Guillet/18s/3.5,3.0,2.5/COQ1732145272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Diane Navoy
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.86
Eryn Brannagan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 21% · published 3
Allison Harrison
published 3
2.29
Jaime Guillet
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 2.5
Jennifer Harty
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Jennifer Jett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Olivier
usually #2 Doubles 59%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Leslie Broussard
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Mikayla Berry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
SHELLY GALLARDO
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
Susan Bullock
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Suzanne Parke
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tracey Kern
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jaime Guillet + Eryn Brannagan2835% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Harty + Jennifer Olivier044 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Harty + Eryn Brannagan044 matchesnot enough data
Tracey Kern + Leslie Broussard123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Jett + Jennifer Harty123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Bullock + SHELLY GALLARDO033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diane Navoy
13W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Eryn Brannagan
14W–22L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Allison Harrison
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Jaime Guillet
9W–26L career · 17 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.29
Jennifer Harty
5W–31L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Jett
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Olivier
6W–32L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Broussard
42W–32L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mikayla Berry
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
SHELLY GALLARDO
14W–55L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Bullock
25W–47L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Parke
5W–32L career · 36 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracey Kern
18W–23L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.