← Teams

STAC-Davis

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Huong Lakin
published 4.5
—
Lisa Gray
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published 4.5
4.17
Monique Eldridge
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.10
Colleen Sharkey
published 4.5
4.09
Chanel Nielsen
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published 4.5
—
Theresa Helland
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 0
Results16 ties
2022-06-26Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesSally Harn / Theresa Helland vs Caitlin Owsley / Dieu Nguyen4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Tami Davis vs Jennifer Kohler / Misa Banks6-1, 6-4
2022-06-25Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Tami Davis vs Andrea Lipper / Jill Casale6-2, 6-1
2022-06-19Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Colleen Sharkey vs Sachiko Ishihara-Spray / Avery Liening6-2, 6-0
2022-06-18Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Colleen Sharkey vs Nicole Wilson / Caitlin Owsley6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesApril Gentry / Lisa Gray vs Chizu Hieida / Jennifer Kohler6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHannah Adams / Monique Eldridge vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-04Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Tami Davis vs Esther Kim / Aline Pereira6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSally Harn / Theresa Helland vs Laurie Ono / Haley Zeylmaker6-2, 6-3
2022-05-22Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesSally Harn / Theresa Helland vs Kay Lorrain / Cheryl Farnham6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Reva Wallace vs Hana Farr / Aline Pereira6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-21Lost 0–1
L#1 SinglesChanel Nielsen vs Kyri Khouri5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-14Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesReva Wallace / Lisa Gray vs Terra Yara / Avery Liening6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChanel Nielsen / April Gentry vs Andrea Lipper / Kenna Canaan6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTami Davis / Monique Eldridge vs Mary Hougan / Jill Casale6-2, 7-6
2022-05-08Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesReva Wallace / Chanel Nielsen vs Denise Zwald / Caroline Truong6-2, 6-3
2022-04-24Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesReva Wallace / Lisa Gray vs Hana Farr / Tonya Schmid6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSally Harn / Theresa Helland vs Angela Byrum / Cheryl Farnham6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTami Davis / Chanel Nielsen vs Haley Zeylmaker / Alison Shapira6-0, 6-3
2022-04-23Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Sally Devine Wright vs Mindy Blakeslee / Liz Suver6-2, 6-3
2022-04-16Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesReva Wallace / Chanel Nielsen vs Holly Yang / Laurie Ono6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-16Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Reva Wallace vs Caitlin Owsley / Quinn Osborn7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTami Davis / Monique Eldridge vs Michelle Harris / Michelle Fladebo7-5, 6-2
2022-03-06Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesAllison Buchman / Lisa Gray vs Tara Heikila / Shannon Fraser6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-30Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesAllison Buchman / Lisa Gray vs Xia Wu / Noriko Satake7-5, 6-1
2022-01-16Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesAlix Edwards / Lisa Gray vs Linda Graham / Donna Roisom6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Huong Lakin
11W–3L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Lisa Gray
90W–56L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Monique Eldridge
102W–56L career
2%98%1%
4.17
4.5
Colleen Sharkey
65W–49L career
2%98%0%
4.10
4.5
Chanel Nielsen
244W–118L career
3%97%0%
4.09
0
Theresa Helland
78W–34L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.