Teams

Sale/Vancura

2026 IA 55 & Over Adult League · 7.0 W 55 Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-12vs IA/Wilkinson/55&Over7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Loeffelholz / Patricia Santonocito vs Karen Braud / Joy Bachmann2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaula Levett / Barbara Vancura vs Josephine Jannes / Lee Johnson4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLois Blankenship / Linda Sadler vs Penee Indelicato / Janice Koder6-2, 6-2
2026-02-27vs Goins/MilavetzWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanalee Kosowski / Bonnie Hinrichs vs Vicki Betts / Diane Norris3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPaula Levett / Cynthia Sale vs Kelly Drake / Tracy Speraw6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnne Marie Moran / Patricia Santonocito vs Patricia Conrad / Penny Raia6-4, 6-3
2026-01-25vs Thompson-Oster/WastaLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Loeffelholz / Cynthia Sale vs Shari Konarske / Nancy Netolicky1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnne Marie Moran / Sandra Monahan vs Caren Wasta / Karen Thinnes2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Koch / Lois Blankenship vs Amy Bemus / Kelly Kolln3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-11-16vs Goins/MilavetzLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Sadler / Kelly Loeffelholz vs Michaele Benn / Catherine Bradley0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJanalee Kosowski / Cynthia Sale vs Patricia Conrad / Sheila Goins6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSandra Monahan / Barbara Vancura vs Mary Milavetz / Penny Raia6-7, 0-6
2025-11-02vs AuerLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanalee Kosowski / Candy Altorfer vs Beth Eganhouse / Karen Kraemer0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Sadler / Kelly Loeffelholz vs Danita Olafson / Cheryl VandeVoorde1-6, 2-6
2025-10-17vs Thompson-Oster/WastaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnne Marie Moran / Lois Blankenship vs Caren Wasta / Cheryl Patten6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Koch / Patricia Santonocito vs Carrie Corbett / Donna Lynch6-1, 7-5
2025-09-21vs IA/Wilkinson/55&Over7.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesCynthia Sale / Kelly Loeffelholz vs Mitzi Hetherton / Jane Terry4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Vancura / Sandra Monahan vs Pamela Kinnevan / Joy Bachmann0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 W 55 Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Wilkinson/55&Over7.0W7118614155
2Auer6220410122
3Thompson-Oster/Wasta3591535256
4Sale/Vancura2671736239
5Goins/Milavetz2661836242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Karen Koch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Paula Levett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Patricia Santonocito
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Bonnie Hinrichs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Kelly Loeffelholz
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.06
Linda Sadler
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Cynthia Sale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Lois Blankenship
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Janalee Kosowski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Barbara Vancura
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Sandra Monahan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Anne Marie Moran
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Candy Altorfer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Loeffelholz + Janalee Kosowski5552% games+3.7% vs expected
Linda Sadler + Kelly Loeffelholz5548% games+0.3% vs expected
Paula Levett + Kelly Loeffelholz3251% games−4.6% vs expected
Linda Sadler + Janalee Kosowski2538% games−10.5% vs expected
Sandra Monahan + Lois Blankenship3348% gamesnot enough data
Linda Sadler + Lois Blankenship134 matchesnot enough data
Paula Levett + Cynthia Sale314 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Sale + Kelly Loeffelholz134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Koch
36W–31L career · 6 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Paula Levett
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Patricia Santonocito
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Bonnie Hinrichs
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Kelly Loeffelholz
24W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
Linda Sadler
13W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Cynthia Sale
8W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Lois Blankenship
18W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.87
Janalee Kosowski
17W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.86
3
Barbara Vancura
4W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Sandra Monahan
16W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
Anne Marie Moran
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Candy Altorfer
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.