Teams

Knight Petal CC

2024 Pine Belt Singles League · 3.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-15vs VAMOSSplit 11
W#1 SinglesPatrick Lamb vs Mehar Virdi2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJoshua Forsythe vs Allen Boleware2-6, 1-6
2024-12-11vs BackhandersWon 21
W#1 SinglesRob Knight vs Ethan Moore6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMatt Dillon vs Charles Hanson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesWes Carlisle vs Tom Hall6-1, 6-2
2024-12-01vs BackhandersLost 12
L#1 SinglesPatrick Lamb vs Jeremy Deans0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJoshua Forsythe vs Will Stevens3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMatt Dillon vs Tom Hall6-3, 6-0
2024-11-24vs Boykin 3.0 singlesWon 21
L#1 SinglesJoshua Forsythe vs Roberto Amay2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesPatrick Lamb vs Jason Boykin6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMatt Dillon vs Michael Ouellette6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-20vs VAMOSWon 30
W#1 SinglesRob Knight vs Mehar Virdi6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesJoshua Forsythe vs Chandler Laudenheimer6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesWes Carlisle vs Allen Boleware7-6, 6-4
2024-11-17vs Malone 3.0Won 21
L#1 SinglesWes Carlisle vs Bradley Floore1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesPatrick Lamb vs Mark Butler2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMatt Dillon vs Shea Malone2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-11-03vs Boykin 3.0 singlesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesWes Carlisle vs Alen Hajnal7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesPatrick Lamb vs Roberto Amay6-2, 7-5
2024-10-27vs Malone 3.0Won 21
W#1 SinglesPatrick Lamb vs Avery Hanson6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesWes Carlisle vs Brett Jones3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJoshua Forsythe vs Bradley Floore1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.57
Rob Knight
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.48
Patrick Lamb
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Joshua Forsythe
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Matt Dillon
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Wes Carlisle
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Dillon + Joshua Forsythe314 matchesnot enough data
Rob Knight + Wes Carlisle303 matchesnot enough data
Rob Knight + Joshua Forsythe303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rob Knight
32W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%30%70%
2.57
Patrick Lamb
11W–11L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%54%46%
2.48
Joshua Forsythe
13W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Matt Dillon
11W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Wes Carlisle
13W–6L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.