Teams

Be.Farrell40C

2025 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-01vs Pa.Spell40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Thompson / Laurie Holderness vs Carol Abercrombie / Amie Ray6-1, 6-3
2025-09-24vs Ca.Novak40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesLauren Hampton / Laurie Holderness vs Kay Bonavita / ROBIN STEWART1-6, 1-6
2025-09-21vs Ki.Manning40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaurie Holderness / Lauren Hampton vs Heath Hilliker / Lisa Hammond1-6, 2-6
2025-09-03Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLaurie Holderness / Susan Gentry vs Michele Gan / Amy Peters1-6, 4-6
2025-08-27vs La.Yopp40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristin Upchurch / Kathryn Nani vs Shannon Vinson / Amanda Meyer6-3, 6-3
2025-08-21vs Ca.Novak40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Potter / Laurie Holderness vs Kelly Blevins / Kelly Talbot5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-08-20vs Ki.Roberts40CSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSusan Gentry / Kathryn Nani vs Michele Chambers / Joan Clifford6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesConnie Dimitroff / Laurie Holderness vs Jane Snyder / Judith Hagopian-Edwards2-6, 5-7
2025-08-13vs Pa.Spell40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Potter / Kathryn Nani vs Kimberlei Gill / Carol Abercrombie6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Stephanie Bradley
published
2.80
Beth Farrell
published 3
2.74
Kristin Upchurch
published
2.70
Laurie Holderness
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Monica Gardner
published
2.61
Kathryn Nani
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.41
Lauren Hampton
published
2.10
Connie Dimitroff
published 2.5
1.99
Jana Inman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Nani + Laurie Holderness213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Bradley
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Beth Farrell
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Courtney Kaprelian
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Upchurch
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Laurie Holderness
78W–107L career · 9 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Monica Gardner
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Kathryn Nani
55W–93L career · 7 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
2.61
Lauren Hampton
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Connie Dimitroff
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Jana Inman
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.