Teams

Anderson - RS Clay

2026 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-28vs Escambia/WorleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesRyan Elliott / Kirk Bradley vs Ryan Duncan / Russ Parris4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Henderson vs Michael Yager6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesClay Anderson / Matthew O'Neill vs Jason Struck / Brett Worley2-6, 6-7
2026-04-09vs Escambia/WorleyLost 04
L#1 DoublesKirk Bradley / Patrick Mrachek vs Brett Worley / Christopher Brown7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Henderson vs Jeff Taylor2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesClay Anderson / Nick Farkas vs Ryan Duncan / Kevin Groom2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKen McCurdy / Matthew O'Neill vs Carl Miller / Lockland Tyler3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-02vs Escambia/WorleyLost 13
L#1 DoublesShane Russell / Kirk Bradley vs Rick Cuny / Michael Yager2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRyan Elliott vs Josh Sitton3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Henderson / Todd Ammons vs Rudy Seelmann / Jason Struck2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNick Farkas / Clay Anderson vs Russ Parris / Kevin Groom4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-03-26vs Escambia/WorleyLost 04
L#1 DoublesBruce Caton / Kirk Bradley vs Emilio Bustillo / Ryan Duncan0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Henderson vs Rudy Seelmann1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Berger / Kevin Corcoran vs Michael Yager / Alex Leonard6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesClay Anderson / Matthew O'Neill vs Brett Worley / Christopher Brown2-6, 1-6
2026-03-19vs Escambia/WorleyLost 13
L#1 DoublesKirk Bradley / Todd Ammons vs Emilio Bustillo / Rick Cuny2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Henderson vs Sean Fell0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNick Farkas / Ken McCurdy vs Kevin Groom / Lockland Tyler3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesClay Anderson / Matthew O'Neill vs Brett Worley / Rudy Seelmann1-6, 2-6
2026-03-12vs Escambia/WorleyLost 04
L#1 DoublesKevin Corcoran / Michael Berger vs Jason Struck / Michael Yager0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMatthew O'Neill vs Sean Fell1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKen McCurdy / Ryan Elliott vs Josh Sitton / Alex Leonard7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesClay Anderson / Nick Farkas vs Carl Miller / Jeff Taylor4-6, 2-6
2026-03-05vs Escambia/WorleyLost 13
W#1 DoublesMichael Miller / Ken McCurdy vs Emilio Bustillo / Lockland Tyler3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRyan Elliott vs Ryan Duncan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Berger / Kevin Corcoran vs Michael Yager / Christopher Brown4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Ammons / Kirk Bradley vs Russ Parris / Kevin Groom6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Ken McCurdy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Ryan Elliott
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.58
Kirk Bradley
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.56
Kevin Corcoran
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Nick Farkas
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
3.47
Michael Berger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Matthew O'Neill
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.43
Todd Ammons
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Patrick Mrachek
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.33
Bruce Caton
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Jeffrey Henderson
usually #1 Singles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published
3.28
Wade Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.15
Clay Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
Shane Russell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nick Farkas + Clay Anderson14658% games+16.2% vs expected
Matthew O'Neill + Clay Anderson6455% games+9.2% vs expected
Kevin Corcoran + Michael Berger044 matchesnot enough data
Wade Wilson + Matthew O'Neill123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken McCurdy
18W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Ryan Elliott
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Kirk Bradley
3W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.58
Kevin Corcoran
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
3.56
Nick Farkas
47W–20L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Michael Berger
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Matthew O'Neill
38W–21L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
Todd Ammons
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.43
Patrick Mrachek
11W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Bruce Caton
1W–4L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
Jeffrey Henderson
16W–14L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Wade Wilson
24W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Clay Anderson
32W–19L career · 9 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Shane Russell
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.