Teams

CLetorney (Piper Glen)

2024 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 6.5 Women - Mon AM

10 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-23vs HDaly (PCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Hunley / Kim Sheehey vs Laurie Hoots / Susan Claire7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-16vs EGold/ENeligan (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Hunley / Susan DeVore vs Virginia Herran / Caroline Crownover0-6, 2-6
2024-09-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Tobia / Linda Hunley vs Sharon Smith / Pat Williams6-2, 6-1
2024-08-29vs JCarnahan (Palisades)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Sheehey / Linda Hunley vs Julie Benton / Jill Carnahan6-7
L#2 DoublesBrenda Tobia / Robin Lancaster vs Michelle Winterich / Karen Davies3-6, 1-6
2024-08-26vs LSobodash (Pine Lake)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Sheehey / Linda Hunley vs Cyndi Thilo / Sharon Surrett6-2, 6-0
2024-08-19vs SConnor (Providence County Club)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRobin Smith / Kim Sheehey vs Judi Affeldt / Carol King6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrenda Tobia / Rebecca Cooper vs Lori Ash / Barbara van Meerten6-2, 6-3
2024-08-12vs TAmos/TLoughlin-Young (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Hunley / Kim Sheehey vs Tracey Hunt / Jane Neese6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 6.5 Women - Mon AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kim Sheehey
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Rebecca Cooper
published
3.07
Linda Hunley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.77
Denise Boeh
published 3
2.54
Brenda Tobia
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Carrie Letorney
published 3
2.35
Wanda Mallette
published
Robin Lancaster
published
Sheryl Reynolds
published
Susan DeVore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Hunley + Kim Sheehey4359% gamesnot enough data
Linda Hunley + Denise Boeh044 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Cooper + Kim Sheehey224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kim Sheehey
54W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.40
Rebecca Cooper
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.16
3
Linda Hunley
26W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Denise Boeh
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Brenda Tobia
32W–71L career · 3 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
2.54
3
Carrie Letorney
15W–29L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48
Wanda Mallette
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
2.35
Robin Lancaster
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sheryl Reynolds
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan DeVore
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.