Teams

Girl Pao-er

Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 5.00 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-12vs RVCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesChloe Ouellet-Pizer / Ksenia Power vs Narelle Krizek / Liz Wetherill6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMeredith Lee / Samantha Nanere vs Tracy Rogers / Darcy Rabenda6-2, 6-1
2026-06-28vs PipkinWon 21
L#1 DoublesNataliya Bredikhina / Madeline de Faber-Schumacher vs Camille Townsend / Stephanie Drake7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSamantha Nanere vs Numneung Koedkietpong6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMeredith Lee / Chloe Ouellet-Pizer vs Cassidy Cruz / Madison Pipkin6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2026-06-21vs A to ZWon 30
W#1 DoublesChloe Ouellet-Pizer / Jennifer Pao vs Stefanie Dill / Katherine Hederick6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMo Bertsch vs Ying Lopez6-0
W#2 DoublesMadeline de Faber-Schumacher / Nataliya Bredikhina vs Ava Steinberger / Kristina Maletta6-1, 6-4
2026-06-14vs RVCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMo Bertsch / Nataliya Bredikhina vs Emma Clark / Liz Wetherill6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKsenia Power vs Nicole Tullo6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMadeline de Faber-Schumacher / Sasha Radulski vs Jasmine Nichole Shaw-Morris / Rocio Fernandez de Camilo4-6, 4-6
2026-06-07vs PipkinLost 12
L#1 DoublesMo Bertsch / Samantha Nanere vs Renee Lee / Madison Pipkin6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMadeline de Faber-Schumacher vs Hannah Pipkin5-5
L#2 DoublesSasha Radulski / Anne Marie Devlin vs Cassidy Cruz / Camille Townsend3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-05-31vs A to ZWon 30
W#1 DoublesChloe Ouellet-Pizer / Jennifer Pao vs Debbie Sharnak / Zoe Sanderson6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMadeline de Faber-Schumacher vs Kelly Hopkins6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSasha Radulski / Nataliya Bredikhina vs Kristina Maletta / Isabel Mejia7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Girl Pao-er061449106
2RVCC0612613134
3Pipkin069922183
4A to Z0611735213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.95
Chloe Ouellet-Pizer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.89
Mo Bertsch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.81
Jennifer Pao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.77
Samantha Nanere
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.76
Madeline de Faber-Schumacher
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Anne Marie Devlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.58
Sasha Radulski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.57
Nataliya Bredikhina
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ksenia Power
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Meredith Lee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Chloe Ouellet-Pizer
11W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.95
Mo Bertsch
48W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.89
Jennifer Pao
55W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.81
Samantha Nanere
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.77
Madeline de Faber-Schumacher
9W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.76
5
Anne Marie Devlin
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sasha Radulski
64W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.58
Nataliya Bredikhina
16W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.57
Ksenia Power
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Meredith Lee
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.